Saturday, December 31, 2011

Re: Mitt Romney is not a natural born citizen


As a long time LDS GENEALOGIST (I was my LDS Ward's Family Genealogist Specialist for a couple of years)...and I have been doing Genealogy since I was in my 20's - which gives me nearly 40 years of experience...I find the Romney "AMERICAN" genealogy to be troubling, if not downright LIES.

The Romney family stories and the entire Internet claim that Mitt Romney's parents were "American Citizens." That is a lot of hogwash, and the Romney family needs to do some genuine genealogy on their family to PROVE their claim of American Citizenship.

Let's start with Mitt Romney's maternal grandfather, Helaman Pratt (son of Parley P. Pratt). Helaman is noted in the LDS website with a death in Mexico in 1907 in Mexico. His daughter, Anna, who married Gaskell Romney (Mitt's grandfather) has two LDS familysearch birth places: 1) Germany in 1854 and 2) Salt Lake City 1853. I believe #1 more than I believe #2.

What is strange is that Helaman supposedly was born either in Scotland, Canada, or Iowa (according to the LDS site). None of the sources are documented so it is a goosey-loosey genealogy.

On the Paternal side, Gaskell's father, Miles was born in England and died in 1904 in Mexico. Gaskell's mother, Hannah Hood Hill was documented to have been born in Canada in 1842. She died in Mexico in 1928-9.

Miles and Hannah did not appear to have been polygamists. But many of their family were. This is why they went to Arizona and then on to Mexico. Miles had a father also named MILES was a polygamist and had about 17-20 wives.

Gaskell Romney seems to have been indeed been born in St George, UT (1871). However at the age of 11, Gaskell moved with his parents to the Arizona Territory (1884). and then a year later Gaskell shows up in Mexico and remained there for the next 29 years of his life.

Gaskell Romney could possible be considered either an anchor baby, or else his parents actually were naturalized in Utah. I find no records where they were I am not convinced yet that Gaskell was a naturalized citizen. I am sure he was no NATURAL BORN birth records have been found for him.

And I wonder about how much Gaskell and his family were "under the jurisdiction" of the United States as per the 14th Amendment. At the time the LDS were in somewhat rebellion against the US Government and troops were being sent in to overthrow the "Mormon leadership."

It is clear that the Romney family found Mexico to be more to their liking. They resided in this foreign nation until they were too scared to stay and fight the Mexican rebels in 1913. They preferred to return to the US and get welfare handouts from the American Taxpayers and hid their secrets and the true Romeny history.

I find no proof that any of the Romney's EVER being naturalized and becoming a part of the American nation. They ran like scared dogs when the LDS were being persecuted and hounded for having more than one wife. And too, the Romney's are collaborators of modern day GOP GAY RIGHTS enthusiasts for more Sodomites in the Military and Sodomite appreciation in the Elementary, Middle and High Schools of America. The Romney's and the GOP bash LDS for past polygamy practices yet remain silent about Sodomites in mainstream America that are destroying our nation. The Romney's of today do not stand and fight and become outraged concerning the anti-LDS crap we hear daily on the TV and Radio. The Romney's are chicken-poops and don't deserve our vote...and they also need to prove their heritage in America.

I would be more open to the Romney family if they were truthful about their past. If there are problems with their citizenship they should be open about it all and not lie and bare falsehoods. In my one of my last posts I mentioned a certain Abdul Hassan who is not a natural born citizen and wants to run for President 2012 (contrary to the US Constitution).

In his lawsuit (see: he states: "the natural born provision is premised on the assumption that foreign born citizens cannot be trusted..."

I would agree somewhat with Mr. Hassan. For the most part, it is all about trust. If Mr. Mitt Romney ever became President, would he be firm on border control and making our nation secure against known Mexican evil-doers since Mr. Romney has such a love towards his father's home of yesteryear? As for Hassan's words (as a foreigner turned citizen) I do not trust most of what he says in his brief! I see lies and misstatements galore. Read it for yourself and see what I mean. As for Romney's genealogy...I see misstatements and lies galore there too! I am a firm believer in the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN clause in the US Constitution. I don't like to be governed by people of questionable loyalties. (Soetoro has proven to me that this to be a sound belief!)

How can I be more clear?

Edward C. Noonan
2012 President
American Independent Party

Mitt Romney is not a natural born citizen

from: Edward C. Noonan
to: "P. B."
bcc: Mark Seidenburg
date: Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:27 AM
subject: Re: Mitt Romney is not a natural born citizen

I didn't say Mitt was born in Mexico. he was born in 1947 in Michigan. However, his father was born in Mexico. You claim George's US citizenship was set in stone because his mother and father had been US Citizens before they escaped as fugitives to Mexico.

George Wilcken Romney's parents were American citizens Gaskell Romney (1871–1955) and Anna Amelia Pratt (1876-1926); they married in 1895 in Mexico and lived in Colonia Dublán, Galeana, in the Mexican state of Chihuahua (one of the Mormon colonies in Mexico) where George was born on July 8, 1907.

Gaskell Romney left the US because US Marshalls had an arrest warrant for Gaskell because of his many wives. He arrived in Mexico in about 1891. Gaskell married in Mexico, and built a successful business in Mexico. Gaskell sired (George) in 1907 with the intent of remaining in Mexico forever.

Wikipedia states: "The Mexican Revolution broke out in 1910 and the Mormon colonies were endangered in 1911–1912 by raids from marauders,[10] including "Red Flaggers" Pascual Orozco and José Inés Salazar.[11] Young George heard the sound of distant gunfire and saw rebels walking through the village streets.[11][12] The Romney family fled and returned to the United States in July 1912, leaving their home and almost all of their property behind.[1][13] Romney would later say, "We were the first displaced persons of the 20th century."[14]

From here on, George Romney grew up in humble circumstances.[15] The family subsisted with other Mormon refugees on government relief in El Paso, Texas for a few months before moving to Los Angeles, California, where the father worked as a carpenter.[13][16] In kindergarten there, other children mocked Romney's national origin by calling him "Mex".
You may want to rewrite history and undo the "Mex" out of the Romney family, but still there is a BIG QUESTION on whether a felon that attempted to escape a US Marshal's arrest is still considered a US Citizen after being a fugitive for nearly 20 years.

But then again, the 1881 DE FACTO thug named Chester Arthur was not a natural born citizen either...hence there is no legal Constitutional document nor Federal organization, so who cares? Everyone is spitting on the Constitution, so what is new?

You are wrong...Mitt Romney needs to account for the citizenship of his father and he needs to prove that his father is indeed considered a US Citizen...and NO GUESSES!


Mitt Romney is not a natural born citizen

From: Edward C. Noonan
Date: Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:04 PM
Subject: Mitt Romney is not a natural born citizen
To: "P. B."


I hate to throw a wrench in your major cog, but one of your Republican Presidential Candidates is not a natural born citizen as well! Mitt Romney's father was born in Mexico. Mitt Romney could be considered a NATURALIZED CITIZEN but cannot ever be considered a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. But I am not absolutely sure he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Mitt's dad was born in Mexico in 1907. I have questions about George's parents being US CITIZENS. But even still, they cannot use the 14th Amendment to claim that George was a US Citizen. They were living in Mexico to escape the JURISDICTION of the US Government and the strict polygamy laws. The Mexican revolts of 1910 made Mexico too dangerous so the Romney family returned to the US. George never "naturalized" to became a US Citizen. Hence, Mitt was born of a none-citizen. Mitt could be considered a "naturalized" citizen (by a real stretch of the imagination) but he cannot consider himself to be a NATURAL BORN.

Mitt Romney needs to prove that his father is indeed a naturalized citizen and got his citizenship after his father returned to be repatriated as an American Citizen.

What say you all?

Edward C. Noonan
President 2012
American Independent Party

More jokes about the silly Article II thing?

This just came in and is dated and entitled:

December 30, 2011 3:21 PM at

I am amazed at their lead statement:
"After Mitt Romney's son made a "birther" joke on the campaign trail, he quickly apologized and downplayed the taboo remarks. President Obama's re-election team, however, is keeping the moment alive and hoping to earn a few bucks off of it."

Could someone please tell me why the subject of BIRTH CERTIFICATES and CITIZENSHIP "is taboo?"

Well, as far as I am concerned...the subject is NOT TABOO! I will not let up as long as the lying GOP and MARXIST Democrats continue to promote their trash-genealogy.

This article continued by saying, "At an event in New Hampshire today, Romney's adult son Matt Romney responded to a question regarding the potential release of his father's tax returns with a joke alluding to doubts about Mr. Obama's place of birth: "I heard someone suggest the other day that as soon as Obama releases his grades and birth certificate and sort of a long list of things, then maybe he'd do it," he said."

At first I was pondering "who made it taboo." Was it the news media? Was this so-called news writer saying that the subject was TABOO because of the media, or was it a ROMNEY forbidden thing?...thus the Romney mindset was that YOU DON'T TALK ABOUT CITIZENSHIP ever, ever, ever! Because, it seems that the Romney's have so many skeletons in the closet, "you Romney-folk just need to remain mum about the topic."

Of course the joking about the bogus certificate issue has been around since the beginning of Soetoro's term as DE FACTO Dictator. Biden (the DE FACTO Vice Dictator) joked about the Certificate and it was reported and written about on March 22, 2009. You can read more at: See the article entitled

Biden jokes about Obama's birth certificate at dinner
Says Cheney left copy of document in vice presidential desk

The real joke, of course, is not about the Birth Certificate (as bogus as it turned out to be) but about whether or not the citizenship of Soetoro's father was full fledged American. Was both of Soetoro's parents citizens of the United States and are there questionable loyalties of Soetoro to all the nations he is a citizen of (over 143)?

I insist the same examination be given to the expatriated Romney family as with any candidate for US President. There is no doubt that George Romney was born in Mexico. But there is no further explanation of the current status of that voluntary swearing of loyalty to the country of Mexico by the Romney clan, nor what citizenship Mitt Romney now holds. George Romney is a Mexican citizen by virture of his birth in that country. The current laws of Mexico claim that once a Mexican YOU'RE ALWAYS A MEXICAN. Hence George Romney has dual citizenship. This also means that the son of George Romney is also considered a dual citizen of Mexico. Therefore Mitt Romney cannot consider himself a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, because he has dual citizenship through the lineage of his father.

There is no doubt that Mitt Romney may be a native born US Citizen. However, proof of being NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by proof that his father was indeed naturalized or got his citizenship some other way needs to be provided to the American people.

I would be interested in hearing any of you pro-Romney people proving me wrong. Or at least hear your defense of why you believe Mitt Romney is eligibile to run for President (again).

Let me know!

Edward C. Noonan
2012 President

Friday, October 7, 2011

Re: Fw: REPUBLICANS = HARLOTS OF HELL - answer to another comment

from: Edward C. Noonan
to: Rich
date: Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:40 AM

Rich you didn't send the address for Nancy. Please forward it to her (if you have the courage).



You make it sound like you are a Christian and live your life according to the Gospel. But I fear that you deny the Gospel and you deny the teachings of Jesus Christ.

And your words condemn your own beliefs and concepts that you pretend to have. You say, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles."

Here you are implying that "the Republican Party has LEFT THEIR FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES!" How can you return to something that you have not left behind. I have been listening to this stupid retort since 1992. This was the day I got so outraged at the evil moron (Bill Clinton) in the White House that I became politically involved. For nearly 20 years of my life I have been hearing how the Republican Party will "return to their original principles." But every year the status quo continues and it gets worse and worse and worse.

Let me ask you this. Has the Republican Party be very vocal about the sodomite issue this year? Pray tell which of you REPUBLICAN HARLOTS (of Lucifer) have been out pounding the pavement to gain public support to keep the sodomites out of the military? What have YOU done as a Christian? Or are you like most of the churches of today that welcome the sodomites into their ministry and their high leadership? I know we must “preach the gospel” to these sodomites, but we should not welcome them as Pastors and Bishops of our church. Or, are you like the Catholic church that finds pedophiles to be acceptable and should be welcomed into their parishes?

Congress now has a SODOMITE CAUCUS to support and promote the sodomite causes.

Wikipedia states:

The LGBT Equality Caucus formation was announced on June 4, 2008, by openly gay representatives Tammy Baldwin and Barney Frank.[1][2] The caucus has 96 members in the 112th United States Congress (94 Democrats and 2 Republicans)[3] and had 91 members (90 Democrats and 1 Republican) during the 111th United States Congress.[4] The caucus is co-chaired by Congress's four openly gay members: Representatives Tammy Baldwin, Barney Frank, Jared Polis and David Cicilline.”

And here in California... the Sodomites have won the hearts of Californians to "teach Sodomite history and 'appreciation'" to the school children, K-12 grades. As a Christian what have you done to fight this evil in Amerika?

And here you sit and complain and whine about me using the words WHORE AND HARLOT and you don’t have a single murmur about Congressional Sodomites, pedophiles and anal-sex promoters? Gimme a break!

And let’s speak on the subject of the 55-60 million murders of unborn citizens…
The Preamble of our constitution states the purpose of our Constitution is to: “…promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…”

Who is our POSTERITY? Is it our unborn? Yes it is! If our constitution protects the welfare and liberty of our posterity…why do you allow them to be murdered without a loud outcry? Would a follower of Jesus Christ murder their future children or would such a person fit the profile as a HARLOT OF SATAN?

You say, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles." What you should be saying is, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its Christian principles."

You get the point… I say, if the shoe fits…WEAR IT! If not, then come on board and help me fight the evil. Else shut up and go back to sleep!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

- Hide quoted text -
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Rich wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: Nancy
To: Rich
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 8:38 AM

Hi Rich,

I am an American who firmly believes in the Constitutional Republic we are suppose to be living in and under. I suppose I should change my "party" affiliation to "Independent" in order to be pleasing. However, I don't do things just to be found pleasing to people. I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles. When and if I find it necessary to change my party, I will do so. The key word I want to emphasize in your note is "seem." I'm confident you're not referring to me as a "HARLOT OF HELL." I haven't sold my soul. And I know many Republicans who haven't either.

I don't know why in this world Mr. Noonan concerns himself wih being offensive. Both words are equally offensive. I know you like this man, Mr. Noonan. I'm sure he is a good man and means well, but I find the way he words things, as correct as he may be, to be reflective of the base culture in which we live. He is therefore, in my opinion,at times offensive. This language may seem to be effective to some, but it doesn't to me. One can make the same point without morphing, in some ways, into the very culture he is slamming.

Jesus called the Pharisees and Sadducees "snakes" and "vipers." He didn't mince words! But He never lowered Himself to become like the culture he condemned! I would also like to note, as well, that a Harlot (Prostitute), Rahab (Joshua 2; 6:22 ~ 25; Hebrews 11:31 (Hebrews 11 is the great Faith chapter of the entire Bible); James 2:25), the one who hid the spies, appears in the very line of Christ! She was the mother of Boaz (Ruth) and appears in the lineage of the Lord Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:5 ~ 16; Luke 3:23 ~ 32)!!! Boaz was the wealthy Bethlehemite who showed favor to Ruth (Ruth 2), married her (Ruth 4), and in so doing became her "kinsman redeemer." (A type of Christ....redeeming all of us!) Boaz was an ancestor of David (Ruth 4:18 ~ 22); I Chronicles 2:12 ~ 15).

My point is that Mr. Noonan and others should be careful with their choice of words lest he and others become like the very ones they're condemning; i. e., "prostituting" themselves and, as a result, being less effective than they might otherwise be.

Thanks for waking me up! Hope you're having a good day!


Thursday, October 6, 2011

Independent Conservatives = 32% of Arizona Tea Party

Last week George Miller invited me to join the Ventura Tea Party website (as a Presidential Candidate). So I did.

And I did assuming that most of the Ventura Tea Party were all mostly REPUBLICANS. I could not speculate how I could make a difference in the Tea Party when they were all controlled by the party that invaded the Southern States without Constitutional authority… or the party that gave us an illegal British citizen as POTUS in 1881 (Chester Arthur). Or the party that ran another illegal alien, named John McCain in 2008… What could I possibly have in common with the Republican Tea Party?

Perhaps I am wrong!

I have been researching the various National Tea Parties today. I spent some time on the Arizona Tea Party Website (See: ). On this site they have a poll asking their members or readers to identify what party they align themselves with. I was surprised to discover it was contrary to what I have been thinking all along!

I don’t know how this would relate to other states and other counties, but there at the Arizona Tea Party, only half seem to identify themselves with the GOP.


Conservative Independents are 32% of the Tea Party voters in this Arizona poll! Of course, I don’t know how reliable this poll is, but it is a good start in showing that the Independents are becoming a more powerful voting block and cannot be swept under the rug anymore!

But it is amusing to read however, that the Arizona Tea Party on their VOTER REGISTRATION PAGE states:

To all of you who are registered as Independents but will want to cast your ballot in the 2012 Presidential primaries for a Republican, you MUST re-register as a Republican. The rules are different than when voting in Congressional only primaries! If you want a voice in the Presidential primary this time around, be sure to re-register as a Republican.”

It is clearly apparent that the leaders of this Tea Party are died-in-the-wool Republicans and this Tea Party has a definite GOP slant.

I would like to commend the VENTURA TEA PARTY. It is the first Tea Party ever to mention my name on their website. My name can be found at: (see bottom of presidential list.)

I ran for US Senate in 2010 and not a single Tea Party would accept my name as a Candidate on their “candidate list.” So I must confess that progress is finally being made! George just made HISTORY!

And too, it is from Arizona that the first Sheriff in America has promised to look into the Soetoro crimes. Bravo to the Arizona Tea Party! Things are looking up!

Edward C. Noonan
President – 2012
American Independent Party

Wednesday, October 5, 2011


It has become clear to me that the founder of the TEA PARTY and 99.9% of all of the Tea Party patriots thereafter are either brainwashed, or totally ignorant of the real problem of America. First, let us discuss the beginnings of the Tea Party. We start on Feb 19, 2009. We had just been taken over by an illegal alien and a false NATURAL BORN CITIZEN as our Commander in Chief. He was/is a Muslim and a Marxist…but then again, what is the difference?

Here is a YouTube of the beginning minutes of the TEA PARTY:

CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party

Poor Mr. Santelli completely misses the point about the crisis in America. He places the blame on Middle Class America that dreams of having their own homes and own property.

Most states give their citizens a promise that it is an inalienable right to own property. My states promises:


SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.

What Santell (Tea Party founder) is completely missing, is that it is NOT the fault of the American people who wants a home (even if it has an extra bathroom or not) but instead it is the fault of the system that is corrupt because of the evil organization that controls every aspect of American life! And this is the FED. The Fed owns the banks, the mortgage companies, the money, the interest rates and all aspects thereof.

I explained in my last post that the FED does not comply with the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913 which mandates it reports ALL TRANSACTIONS to Congress…but it does not and has NEVER done so EVER! There has been no oversight over this corrupt banking cabal since day one!

The Fed was spawned in 1913. Here is a Congressional Record speech by Congressman McFadden in 1934:

Congressman McFadden's Speech
On the Federal Reserve Corporation
Congressional Record 1934

“The Federal Reserve - - A Corrupt Institution”
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.

"This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

"Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime…”

[end quote]

That was what was being said in 1934…let us fast forward to 2009, 2010 and 2011…

After the Kenyan/Indonesian illegal alien became the DE FACTO dictator of the United States, an on-air editor for the CNBC Business News network named Rick Santelli became one of the founding fathers of the TEA PARTY. Wikipedia says, "Santelli accused the government of "promoting bad behavior", and raised the possibility of a "Chicago Tea Party". He also suggested that individuals who knowingly purchased high-risk mortgages (and faced impending foreclosure as a consequence) were "losers".

I find this to be offensive to accuse Americans of being “LOSERS” because they desire a home to call their own! And I find it offensive we live in a society that makes Americans “LOSERS” when the only home they can get…is with “high risk mortgages.”

And Wikipedia reports, “On November 4, 2010, the Tea Party Patriots organization confirmed in an email to their members that Santelli's comments did in fact start the Tea Party movement.”

And Wikipedia continues, "Tea Party Patriots wishes to extend a special thank you to Rick Santelli for his rant on February 19, 2009, which started this entire movement. Without Rick's rant, this movement would never have started. Many others will try to take credit but don't be fooled. He was the spark that began this fire."

Yes, perhaps a slight word of thanks to Santelli could be given…but the fact still remains. The FED CONTROLS OUR WEALTH, OUR PROSPERITY AND OUR FUTURE. And long as Santelli and the dream slobbering Tea Partiers are apathetic about the FED, all endeavors they attempt are for naught!

Wikipedia also says, "In addition to this acclaim from the Tea Party movement, Santelli has also garnered some praise from libertarians:

In the world of financial "journalism," CNBC’s Rick Santelli stands out as a refreshing and intelligent antidote to the hoards of perma-bulls, fed apologists, and chart sorcerers that otherwise pollute the financial airwaves. Apart from his wonderfully energetic and quirky manner of speaking, and apart from his fantastic last name, Santelli is never afraid to challenge economists, Fed officials, and other mainstream talking heads. Talking points that are taken for granted or left unchallenged by Santelli’s mind-numbing colleagues are passionately attacked by the bond-tracking Italian dervish."

To this I say, as long as Ron Paul staples the REPUBLICAN tag on his forehead, he too is enslaved to forever worshipping and adoring the Federal Reserve thugs who control both of the two big buck political parties.

With this in mind, every TEA PARTY member should be required to watch two YouTube videos. One is with Rick Santelli. It is what I have entitled “The Fed is like a bad appendix ready to explode.”


The other is where Rick Santelli asks 'Who created the Federal Reserve?" and mentions Jekyll Island

It is astonishing how fast the conversation was quickly diverted AWAY from any discussion of the matter of Jekyll Island and the secret origins of the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (aka International Bankster cabal)!

Did you know Daily Kos has accused the FED of ripping American taxpayers off for over $47 Trillion dollars…which each American is liable to cover?

Daily Kos reports, "In case you haven't seen the OCC Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives for 2009, I think you might be interested in seeing exactly what is being hidden off the balance sheets that most American are not aware of.....try $47 Trillion dollars of derivatives backed by the government or rotting in some toxic pool that nobody wants anyone to know about, or more important wants you to know about."$47-Trillion-Toxic-Derivatives-the-Banks-FED-Are-Hiding

(NOTE: From my research this is just in the United States...worldwide the International Bankster cabal holds $1.2 Quadillion in Toxic/worthless assets.)

My recommendation to the Tea Parties and their leadership… stop accepting the accusation that it is American citizen’s fault for not keeping a job, or not keeping their home (due to foreclosure). The fault lies with the criminal CENTRAL BANKS of every country that has stolen the wealth from their peoples. Ben “Lucifer” Bernanke and his evil cohorts (in the Republican and Democrat Parties) are pure evil and this should be the focus of the Tea Party. Else America is dead and can never be resurrected.

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

Senator Bernie Sanders doesn't know squat (about the FED)

Senator Bernie Sanders this month thought he was opening a pandora’s box by accusing the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke with the crime of stealing $16 Trillion from the American people. On Sander’s webpage, he quotes the GAO supposedly new (1st ever) report concerning the theft of the American’s taxpayers cash and spending the money on foreign banks and U.S. and foreign “fat-cat” corporations. You can read Sanders accusations at:

"As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," said Sanders.

Sanders provided his “backup proof” by providing a link to the GAO report document that he was quoting:

I was all pumped up get this new information. I am opposed on the entire concept of the FED and want to find as much dirt as I can on this unconstitutional organization. The FED is not constitutional now, nor will they EVER be! And I firmly believe that the FED is indeed raping the American public by giving our taxpayer money out to foreign countries and banks.

But as usual… our Senators are complete morons. It is clear that Sanders never read the GAO report nor did anyone in his staff. There are no such accusations by the GAO report detailing a $16 Trillion expenditure (or totaling $16 Trillion) anywhere in the gibberish filled document that the GAO calls a “FED AUDIT.” $1 Trillion, $2 Trillion and up to $5 Trillion here and there are mentioned, but no PROOF of $16 Trillion being taken out of our coffers.

au·dit/ˈôdit/ Noun: An official inspection of an individual's or organization's accounts, typically by an independent body.

Verb: Conduct an official financial examination of (an individual's or organization's accounts).

If Sanders or anyone in the GAO, or anyone in the US Senate calls this “an audit” then it is clear why our nation is so screwed up! It was 252 pages of totally worthless goobledygook. There is not a lawyer, a brain surgeon, a philosopher in the world that could understand two adjoining sentences in this report! Here is an example:

On September 19, 2008, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board) authorized the creation of the Asset- Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (AMLF) under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to provide liquidity support to money market mutual funds (MMMF) facing redemption pressures and to promote liquidity in the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) markets.1 AMLF became operational on September 22, 2008, and was operated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (FRBB). AMLF was initially set to expire on January 30, 2009. The Federal Reserve Board authorized three separate extensions of the program to address continuing strains in financial markets. AMLF expired on February 1, 2010.” [pg 155 actual page or pg 168 pdf]

This amusing gibberish is totally unintelligible. And not only that, Sec 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 gives no such “authorization.” This is a ploy that the FED uses throughout all of their “documentation” and of course, no one ever checks up and verifies their claims to see if the ACT actually authorizes them to do squat! But here is the actual worthless verbage of the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913:

Section 13. Powers of Federal Reserve Banks
3. Discounts for Individuals, Partnerships, and Corporations
A. In unusual and exigent circumstances, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, by the affirmative vote of not less than five members, may authorize any Federal reserve bank, during such periods as the said board may determine, at rates established in accordance with the provisions of section 14, subdivision (d), of this Act, to discount for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility, notes, drafts, and bills of exchange when such notes, drafts, and bills of exchange are indorsed or otherwise secured to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve bank: Provided, That before discounting any such note, draft, or bill of exchange, the Federal reserve bank shall obtain evidence that such participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility is unable to secure adequate credit accommodations from other banking institutions. All such discounts for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility shall be subject to such limitations, restrictions, and regulations as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe.
i. As soon as is practicable after the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the Board shall establish, by regulation, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the policies and procedures governing emergency lending under this paragraph. Such policies and procedures shall be designed to ensure that any emergency lending program or facility is for the purpose of providing liquidity to the financial system, and not to aid a failing financial company, and that the security for emergency loans is sufficient to protect taxpayers from losses and that any such program is terminated in a timely and orderly fashion. The policies and procedures established by the Board shall require that a Federal reserve bank assign, consistent with sound risk management practices and to ensure protection for the taxpayer, a lendable value to all collateral for a loan executed by a Federal reserve bank under this paragraph in determining whether the loan is secured satisfactorily for purposes of this paragraph.
ii. The Board shall establish procedures to prohibit borrowing from programs and facilities by borrowers that are insolvent. Such procedures may include a certification from the chief executive officer (or other authorized officer) of the borrower, at the time the borrower initially borrows under the program or facility (with a duty by the borrower to update the certification if the information in the certification materially changes), that the borrower is not insolvent. A borrower shall be considered insolvent for purposes of this subparagraph, if the borrower is in bankruptcy, resolution under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or any other Federal or State insolvency proceeding.
iii. A program or facility that is structured to remove assets from the balance sheet of a single and specific company, or that is established for the purpose of assisting a single and specific company avoid bankruptcy, resolution under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or any other Federal or State insolvency proceeding, shall not be considered a program or facility with broad-based eligibility.
iv. The Board may not establish any program or facility under this paragraph without the prior approval of the Secretary of the Treasury.
C. The Board shall provide to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives—
i. not later than 7 days after the Board authorizes any loan or other financial assistance under this paragraph, a report that includes—
I. the justification for the exercise of authority to provide such assistance;
II. the identity of the recipients of such assistance;
III. the date and amount of the assistance, and form in which the assistance was provided; and
IV. the material terms of the assistance, including—
§ aa. duration;
§ bb. collateral pledged and the value thereof;
§ cc. all interest, fees, and other revenue or items of value to be received in exchange for the assistance;
§ dd. any requirements imposed on the recipient with respect to employee compensation, distribution of dividends, or any other corporate decision in exchange for the assistance; and
§ ee. the expected costs to the taxpayers of such assistance; and
ii. once every 30 days, with respect to any outstanding loan or other financial assistance under this paragraph, written updates on—
I. the value of collateral;
II. the amount of interest, fees, and other revenue or items of value received in exchange for the assistance; and
III. the expected or final cost to the taxpayers of such assistance.
D. The information required to be submitted to Congress under subparagraph (C) related to—
i. the identity of the participants in an emergency lending program or facility commenced under this paragraph;
ii. the amounts borrowed by each participant in any such program or facility;
iii. identifying details concerning the assets or collateral held by, under, or in connection with such a program or facility, shall be kept confidential, upon the written request of the Chairman of the Board, in which case such information shall be made available only to the Chairpersons or Ranking Members of the Committees described in subparagraph (C).
E. If an entity to which a Federal reserve bank has provided a loan under this paragraph becomes a covered financial company, as defined in section 201 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, at any time while such loan is outstanding, and the Federal reserve bank incurs a realized net loss on the loan, then the Federal reserve bank shall have a claim equal to the amount of the net realized loss against the covered entity, with the same priority as an obligation to the Secretary of the Treasury under section 210(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
[12 USC 343. As added by act of July 21, 1932 (47 Stat. 715); and amended by acts of Aug. 23, 1935 (49 Stat. 714); Dec. 19, 1991 (105 Stat. 2386); and July 21, 2010 (124 Stat. 2113). As enacted by Public Law 111-203 (124. Stat. 2115), “any reference in any provision of Federal law to the third undesignated paragraph of section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act [FRA] (12 USC 343) shall be deemed to be a reference to section 13(3) of the FRA.”]

There are no two people in America or on this planet that can give a solid, meaningful summary of this Section 13. No two lawyers can even define the words let alone the concepts of any two sentences therein. If any one of you think you have even a partially functioning brain, please just give me a summary and MEANING of just the 1st paragraph of above Section 13 (3)… or if you think I am being too harsh/mean, then pick any section, any page and paragraph of the other 31 Sections of this gibberish of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and please attempt to translate the unintelligible mumblings found therein.

Bernie, all I can say… is that you don’t know squat! Between you and the FED, I understand why our nation is so SCREWED!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

from: Edward C. Noonan
to: Beda Biswalo
date: Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:33 AM
subject: Re: The Citizen: Your source?

Dear Mr. Biswalo

First of all, let me comment on my surprise that someone from the media would take the time to comment on my letter and my observations. During the last three years I have written hundreds of letters to editors of various news organizations throughout America (and England). Not a single news source has ever bothered to respond and answer me personally. I know they have been told by their puppet masters to ignore anyone with an opinion different than theirs. So you, my friend, have made history! Most of the American news media, when commenting on this Constitutional crisis that America now faces, is to use ridicule and distain towards the citizenry that are concerned with the violation of our founding document. For in our Constitution it states that only a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN can qualify for the Presidency of the United States.

You may not understand what this means…what is NATURAL BORN? The way I explain it, is this… the opposite of natural is alien. If there is any part of one’s birth that is “alien” then that birth cannot be considered NATURAL. In Mr. Soetoro’s circumstance, his father was an ALIEN foreign national and NOT a citizen of the United States. Therefore, Mr. Soetoro cannot claim to be “natural” to our country. If his father had become a citizen prior to the birth of Soetoro then Soetoro could have claimed to be NATURAL if he had indeed been born in Hawaii. But there are many claims otherwise. I am astonished that you have not seen or heard of the Kenyan birth certificate. Here is a image of it:

I am sure that you must have seen this Kenyan birth certificate, but your newspaper archives make no mention of it when I did a “search” for certain key words. The most commented story that your newspaper has ever done was on this single "Obama/birther" story you did on July 29, 2010.

What you fail to realize is that there has been a worldwide media freeze against this story. Even though it is the most important U.S. story of the century… or at least since 1881 when the last NON-NATURAL BORN CITIZEN was elected unconstitutionally to the Presidency of the United States. Chester Arthur (Republican) was not a citizen of the United States. I am afraid that Mr. Soetoro is also NOT A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES as well!

So, it surprises me that you run away from the story of the century and pretend the story does not exist!

But yet it does not matter if Soetoro was not born in Kenya or not. He is still not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN because his father was not a US citizen. At best Soetoro could be a native born, but not NATURAL BORN. (But he is not, he is an illegal alien. He became a citizen of Indonesia and was never repatriated.)

Do you not see where your paper printed the name Adbullah as a Soetoro’s 2nd middle name? Here is the quote of your entire paragraph (2nd paragraph):

But after political changes globally, and strengthening of democracy, things have changed in the US. We witnessed last year a senator with his origins from east Africa, Barack Abdallah Husein Obama, becoming the first black US president. He won the race on Democrat ticket and was sworn on January 20, 2009 as US president.”

I sent you a copy of the “screen capture” of your news page in my last post (see below) and it is right there for everyone to see. So, my question still remains, WHERE DID Hawra Shamte and Salim Said get this info? It is not on the two bogus Hawaiian birth certificates, or the Kenyan birth certificate or in Soetoro’s book DREAMS FROM MY FATHER. What document did they get this name from?

Thank you for pointing out that there were COMMENTS following this 2010 article. I did not bother to read them, but now that I did, I find that most of what I have queried you on, has already been posted on your website. Why do you dismiss the writers of those comments? Why is it they understand the constitutional issue and you refuse to address this matter? You are turning up your nose at the biggest story of your life!

I challenge you to print my letters to you “in full” on your news webpage. If you have the courage to do so, you will find this will be the biggest story for your news organization since 2009, 2010, 2011 and it will continue on into 2012 and beyond! This story will NOT go away and it will continue to fester in America until a great civil war breaks out. Why not get in on the truth at the beginning? Who is holding you back? Who’s pulling your strings?

At anyrate, I hope we continue to discuss this matter. I hope you do not ignore this story. There is no American story with more importance. America hinges on the outcome of the resolution of this matter.

[s] Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

Monday, September 26, 2011

Demons at Fed to monitor billions of conversati​ons!

“6 Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land;
7 And as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this, cometh of evil.”

Earlier this morning I sent out my post entitled The FEDERAL RESERVE = DEMON BANKSTERS OF HELL. I was sure that I was alone in my strongly held belief that the FED = PURE EVILNESS. And then when I got to my office and was checking my email, and I got this honey of a post from RIGHTSIDENEWS. The article was entitled:

The Federal Reserve Plans To Identify "Key Bloggers"
And Monitor Billions Of Conversations .


I immediately checked on the NEWSWITHVIEWS websites to learn more. Fortunately they gave a scribd document source. It can be located at:

Page 10 shows that the FED admits to their plans to snoop for anti-FED blogs (like mine) and on Twitter, FaceBook and billions of other internet sources.

II. Social Listening Platforms

Social media listening platforms are solutions that gather data from various social media outlets and news sources. They monitor billions of conversations and generate text analytics based on predefined criteria. They can also determine the sentiment of a speaker or writer with respect to some topic or document. The information gathered can guide the organizations public relations group in assessing the effectiveness of communication strategies. Here are some of the services it can offer:

o Track reach and spread of your messages and press release s
o Handle crisis situations
o Continuously monitor conversation s
o Identify and reach out to key bloggers and influencers
o Spot emerging trends, discussions themes and topics


III. Mandatory Minimum Solution Requirements

A. Geographic scope of social media sites
The solution must support content coming from different countries and geographical regions. It should also support multiple languages.
B. Content and Data Types
The solution must be able to gather data from the primary social media platforms –Facebook, Twitter, Blogs, Forums and YouTube. It should also be able to aggregate data from various media outlets such as: CNN, WSJ, Factiva etc.
C. Reports and Metrics
The solution must provide real-time monitoring of relevant conversations. It should provide sentiment analysis(positive, negative or neutral) around key conversational topics. It must be able to provide summaries or high level overviews of a specific set of topics. It should have a configurable dashboard that can easily be accessed by internal analysts or management. The dashboard must support customization by user or group access. The solution should provide an alerting mechanism that automatically sends out reports or notifications based a predefined trigger.
D. FRBNY (Federal Reserve Bank - New York) Technology Integration
The solution must be able to integrate with existing FRBNY technologies such as: Google Search appliance, Lotus notes suite and web trends. It must have support for single sign on or windows integrated authentication.

This will be the most diabolical invasion of our privacy since the history of mankind began. There can be no greater Constitutional breach of our freedom of speech than this new ghoulish international bankster enslavement-dream! It will send a chill throughout the land.

The unclean demons of the Federal Reserve System MUST BE EXORIZED! NOW!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012


In my last posts I have been crying repentance to Amerika concerning the fact that Republicans are the HARLOTS OF HELL. My words have absolutely gone unread and ignored. One of my readers forwarded my post to many of the major news outlet in Amerika… I have also put the URL on FACEBOOK. Out of 3,000 – 5,000 potential readers…my webpage only got 5 hits. And I believe one of those hits was ME, CHECKING OUT THE HIT-COUNTER.

It is my conclusion that Amerikans and especially Amerikan leaders don’t give a “rat’s-patoot” about the Amerikan economy, and the Harlots of Hell could care less about the 3,000,000 foreclosures since 2006 and the 5,000,000 new foreclosures upcoming! The only thing they are concerned with, it how CHAZ danced on Dancing With The Stars.

The Amerikan Government is broke and deep in debt. And what is causing the foreclosure of so many homes of private citizens? Is it that Amerikans are dead-beats and don’t care about their property and family home? And what about the 1,000,000 bankruptcies filed in 2010? Is it that businesses are slothful money-managers? No it is not!

Every penny that goes in and out of Amerika is controlled by the Federal Reserve (the master Demon-banksters of Hell.) Last year the Fed raped the Amerikan citizenry and stole ½ billion dollars and paid off Greece’s Socialist-budget-shenanigans. And it is amusing to see that Greece is still in financial woes. Since they do not pare back and get their socialist spending under control they are caught in a never-ending downward fall.

The Demon-FEDsters also have created a vast (losing) Amerikan borrowing plan from the Chinese communists. Amerika now owes their soul to the Communist party of China. We have borrowed 1.6 trillion dollars from the modern day Demon-Communists of China. In addition to this alarming fact, the Demon-FEDsters have also guided Amerikans into a 14 trillion dollar debt. What kind of a righteous bankster would allow their CLIENT to get mired into a 14 Trillion dollar grave? We have sold our souls for a quick breakfast-bowl of rotten porridge.

I will not beat around the bush. I am telling all of Amerika that they have absolutely sold their soul-less eternity to Lucifer. Amerika has embarked on a path of evilness and ill-doing by their support of the Republican Harlots of Hell and their allowing the Democrat Demons of Satan to gain and maintain a hold upon their nation.

I have lived all my life with a scripture that was taught to me as a child…it said:

“6 Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land;
7 And as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this, cometh of evil.”

The Preamble of the US Constitution gives the goal of “America” which is to:

“…establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

NOTHING that the Demon-International Banksters are doing/have done is Constitutional, nor helps us “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” Instead, the Demon-Democrat/Marxist Banksters have caused our posterity to be enslaved with debt and we ourselves have lost all possibility of personal freedom and prosperity!

A vote in 2012 for your favorite Republican harlot or your reigning Democrat Son-of-Satan will not resurrect our Constitution, nor will your upcoming vote free us from tyranny.

When will Amerikans ever learn?

Edward C. Noonan
President 2012

Saturday, September 24, 2011

A Republican Harlot of Hell Objects!

I’ve gotten my first objection regarding my comment aimed at Rick Santorum’s debate statement that he would do nothing about the sodomites within the military. I have been told I am wrong and Santorum did in fact present a strong argument in opposition to the sodomite population infesting the military. But this is not true. Santorum in no way showed any strength of leadership against the sodomy lifestyle. Here are his words:

Rick Santorum: “I would not throw them out...That would not be fair because of the policy of this administration but we would move forward in conformity with what was happening in the past which was... sex is not an issue, it should not be an issue, leave it alone, keep it to yourself whether you're a heterosexual or homosexual.”

To me, most of his words are pure gibberish. The best I can decipher his garbled mumblings is that “he would not throw sodomites out of the military” and we should “leave it alone.”

The UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) states:

Article 125
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

I am assuming that the UCMJ is going to be changed to accommodate Mr. Soetoro’s new Military Sodomy ACT? Please tell me how is this all going to end when it is finally discovered that Soetoro is an illegal alien and he had no authority to sign such an order let alone squat in the White House?

So I stand with my original accusation…The Republicans are Harlots of Hell!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

Friday, September 23, 2011



I pondered about the decision to use the word WHORE or HARLOT in my title. I am aware that both words will offend most people. Even though the word HARLOT is used 50 times in the Bible (both Old and New Testament) and the word WHORE is used 76 times…I have decided to use the lesser used word “Harlot” instead of “Whore.” Harlot seems slightly less offensive that the word Whore… but both mean the same.

Firstly, I want to point out that it is my personal opinion that the Republicans are the HARLOTS OF HELL… and of course, the Democrats are the DEMONS OF HELL. There is a big difference. A demon and a harlot are both evil, but a demon is by far the greatest evil. But my essay here is not concerning the demons. I am merely addressing the harlots that go to bed with these demons.

I was watching the 3rd Republican debate last night on television. It was the one sponsored by Google and the Tea Party. They had asked for questions from the public to be asked to the Presidential candidates. I had submitted my own question but did not believe the Harlots of the Hell would bother asking MY question during the debate. My question was, “What do the candidates think about the problem of Soetoro’s unconstitutional POTUS usurption because he is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?

Of course the question was not asked. It was not asked in the first debate, nor the second debate, nor this debate last evening. The Harlots of Hell, last night were content to hide from the truth and were happy in obeying the Prince of Lies and to continue to deceive Amerika. So the question about whether or not Mr. Soetoro has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he is qualified to be the POTUS was never asked…NOR WILL BE EVER ASKED! EVER! Not by any of the modern day Harlots of Hell!

Nor was the question asked about the sodomization of the Military and elementary schools in America. Mr. Soetoro’s recent enactment of the repeal of the DON’T ASK DON’T TELL (DADT status in the military was ignored by the Harlots of Hell on the POTUS stage last night. Not a peep was said about the sodomy act being mainstreamed into Amerika. And just the night before, CHAZ, the daughter/son of Cher was proudly displayed before Amerika as the newest form of adoration for deviant lifestyles. The Amerikan Harlots of Hell went berserk over this new titillating monstrosity. Of course, sodomite Bruno Tonioli has been a mainstay of the DWTS show for a while now. So for three debates now, not hardly a peep has been uttered on the Harlot-debates concerning the moral cesspool that Amerika has become.

Davy Crockett (unsourced) ~ “There ain’t no ticks like poly-ticks. Bloodsuckers all.”

The pro-life issue is another topic that is being ignored by the Harlot-debates. The bloody murder of innocent unborn children is an evil that modern-day Republican harlots do not want to address. I do believe that the candidates on the stage last night were mild to strongly in favor of the pro-life movement…but they do all they can to keep silent and not to make this a big issue in the 2012 election. Why would the murder of 55 – 60 million unborn citizens be a worthy subject to talk about? Why rock the boat! It’s easier to be a silent Harlot-from-Hell candidate and get elected so they can serve Lucifer better. (“To murder to get gain.”)

And of course, I agree with Pastor James David Manning… He claims that, “Obama is a Deceiver and Son of Satan.” (See: I am convinced that all Democrats are likewise associated with Satan and follow this evil party either willingly or by foolhardy ignorance. But this is another matter and will not be addressed here..

I would be willing to debate this matter with anyone that wishes to do so. Until then, the accusation stands… the Republicans = the HARLOTS OF HELL.

Edward C. Noonan
President 2012

Wednesday, September 21, 2011


RE: 2012 Presidential Candidates – One Question Only

To: JB Williams c/o:

Your words are absurd. There can be no election possible! We do not have a constitutionally authorized federal government. It ended as of January 20th, 2009 when the Supreme Bonehead Thug named John Roberts swore in an illegal alien to the office of POTUS. Since America cannot seem to define what the qualifications of a POTUS is, and what the meaning of NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is, then there cannot be a POTUS. Such confusion mandates that the Constitution be null and void until such a definition is ratified by 3/4ths of all the states. The Constitution cannot be hailed as our Supreme Law of the Land, because no one seems to agree what the supreme law is.

Yes, I am running for President. But there can be no valid election! Our dead Constitution’s Article I, Section 9 states: “no…ex post facto Law shall be passed.”

In the matter of the eligibility of an illegal alien being allowed to be sworn in as POTUS, this is considered an ex post facto law, which is expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution. Nowhere in the US Constitution is an illegal alien allowed to hold ANY Federal elected office.

And any elected or appointed Federal official that has allowed an illegal alien to remain in office (for three years) is an enemy of the Constitution and has thereby caused its death. PERIOD.

All current candidates that have not made this a prime campaign in the 2012 prior to August 2011 is a domestic enemy to the Constitution and have no right to be elected or run as a candidate.

Any American citizen that votes for any candidate that has not committed to battling the Soetoro thuggery is an enemy to the Constitution. Perry, Romney, Paul, Bachmann, Cain, and all the rest are anti-constitutional pigs and should be arrested as traitors to the Constitution. All Americans who vote for one of these Republican cesspool swimmers are no better than the murderers that killed our Constitution. Are you going to vote for one of these Constitution-“murderers?”

Any one that voted for McCain, another non-natural born citizen is also a traitor to the Constitution. He is another illegal alien from the State of Arizona and should be deported back to Panama where he was born. Colon, Panama is NOT part of the Panama Canal Zone, therefore McCain is a citizen of Panama. And McCain has never been naturalized as a US Citizen.

Edward C. Noonan
President – 2012
(which is not a valid, constitutional election!)
American Independent Party

Friday, September 16, 2011

Interview: Manning Report on Monday, 19 September

from: Edward C. Noonan
to: Elizabeth Manning
cc: Alice Benson - National Campaign Chair - Noonan4President
bcc: Mark Seidenberg - AIP State Chair,
date: Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:25 AM
subject: Re: [Fwd: [atlahmedianetwork] Re: The Coward State Of America]

I would love to come on the Manning Report. It is one of my favorite sources of information and data regarding the "Soetoro nightmare." Please let me know what time (Pacific) that I will be "up" on Monday.

[s] Edward C. Noonan
2002 Candidate - Secretary of State (CA)
2006 Candidate - Governor (CA)
2010 Candidate - US Senate (CA)
President 2012
2006-2008 State Party Chairman - American Independent Party


- Hide quoted text -

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Elizabeth Manning wrote:

Peace Mr. Noonan,

I am contacting you to come on the Manning Report on Monday, 19 September.
Would that day work for you?

Mrs. Elizabeth Sarah Manning for Dr. James David Manning

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Sonoran "E-Verify on Obama yields SSN mismatch notice"

The Conservative Voice of Arizona

The Sonoran News did a good piece on Mr. Soetoro's SS# not matching government records. In otherwords, it proves that he is using an illegal and fraudlent Social Security number. The article was entitled, "E-Verify on Obama yields SSN mismatch notice." This should have sent shock waves throughout the White House, Congress, Supreme Court and all of the other corrupt federal hacks and thugs. E-Verify is supposed to be a way to determine if an illegal alien is using a correct social security number for employment purposes... and in this case it did its job! Mr. Soetoro's illegal social security number was flagged and Attorney Orly Taitz is one step closer in nailing Soetoro to the wall! And then of course, Soetoro may soon face other charges of Treason and a truck-load of other crimes of fraud and deception.

The E-Verify webpage states, "In some cases, the information from an employee's Form I-9 does not match government records and E-Verify will display a temporary case status that may require additional action. In these cases, E-Verify will return a response called a "Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC)." A TNC response means that the Social Security Administration (SSA) and/or the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) could not confirm that the employee's information matches government records. It does not mean an employee is unauthorized to work or is an illegal immigrant as there are legitimate reasons why an employee may receive this result."

Mr. Soetoro (illegal alien of the White House) naturally will achieve both the Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) for both the SSA as well as the DHS rejection. I disagree with the summary of the E-Verify webpage... I believe that in Soetoro's case, it DOES mean that he is not authorized to work and is indeed an illegal alien!

I am amused that the E-Verify webpage states, ""DHS Verification in Process" response" and will be forthcoming. I don't plan on holding my breath while THIS happens.

The E-Verify webpage also states, "DHS Tentative Nonconfirmation: There are two types of "DHS TNCs." The first type means that DHS was unable to verify employment eligibility and the employee is instructed to call DHS to find out how to resolve the discrepancy." I wonder how soon Orly will get an answer from the DHS "to resolve the discrepancy."

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

The arrest of Congress and the Supreme Court is neigh!

Attorney Orly Taitz just posted Mr. Soetoro's Income Tax form on her webpage. It is shown as follows:

It is my opinion that Orly has nailed it...Mr. Soetoro is using a Connecticut Social Security number from a dead guy! This number has been partially covered as per court document rules but the first three numbers are all that is necessary to prove the origin of the SS number.

At too, the tax form is incorrect. The idiot attorneys that filled out this form for Mr. Soetoro and Mrs. Soetoro did not identify the correct "State"... WASHINGTON DC is NOT a State of the Union. The tax form clearly asks for THE STATE of the tax payer...and Mr. and Mrs. Soetoro claim they are filing from the State of Washington DC.

Orly states on her BEFOREITSNEWS blog claims that the Selective Service online "Registration Checker" shows Soeotoro using the number when he registered with the Selective Service in 2008 (so he could get a federal pay check). See:

I decided to check out the Selective Service webpage and only got a scrubbed (our of order) message:

If elected PRESIDENT my first Executive act will be to place Soetoro and all members of Congress and the Supreme Court under arrest for Treason. It is time to hold these thugs accountable!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

Thursday, September 8, 2011

The new C. F. Kerchner Ad

I got a CFP COMMENT email today which stated:

reply-to: ""
date: Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:43 AM
subject: someone_just_responded_to_your_comment

Someone just responded to the entry you subscribed to at: Canada Free Press

The title of the entry is: Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – The real issue for

You can see the comment at the following URL:

Bill W. You ask for proof of O's fraud. The social security admin has written to taitz under FOIA. On their letter head, they stated that the ss# O is using was not issued to him. See the official documentation at

Selective service card is fraud and O himself said he "signed up" for the draft when at the time there was no draft.

He is ot eligible b/c his father was never an american citizen. go to

What are we waiting for ppl? How long are we going to keep quiet.


I check out the referenced URL but no such webpage is found. There is Orly's page at but there is no "document" from the SS Administration denying Soetoro is using a fraudulent SS#.

But my search did help me come across an ad that C. F. Kerchner is trying to put in advertising spots in his area. It's awesome!

You can download a copy of this flyer to pass out at:

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
American Independent Party

Wednesday, September 7, 2011


Every Federal officer, employee, member of the military, every Pentagon worker, member of the Supreme Court, the Federal Court and every member of the White House and all Cabinet offices and departments thereof, are traitors to the US Constitution and need to be fired and tried by their local county court for violation of their oath of office.

The oath that they took upon employment as servants of this nation is as follows:

5 U.S.C. § 3331 : US Code - Section 3331: Oath of office

“An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: "I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God." This section does not affect other oaths required by law.”

There has been a vast outcry of millions of the citizens of the United States demanding that Mr. Soetoro, an illegal alien who resides unconstitutionally in the White House (and does not have a two parents that is a United States citizen) needs to be brought to answer the charges brought against him. It has been charged that Mr. Soetoro’s birth father was a foreign national from the nation of Kenya. There are also charges that Soetoro was born in Kenya as a foreign national. For three years not a single US Federal employee anywhere on the planet that has taken action to thwart this illegal alien that is Commander in Chief of our military. LTC Terry Lakin attempted to reveal the corruption of the election system but he was tried in a Kangaroo court, convicted without defense and sent to prison. He is the only Federal employee (military) that has gone up against our corrupt political system. I promise that he will be pardoned and paid for his excellent service as soon as I become President.

When elected President, I plan on firing every one of these cesspool thugs and replace them with a patriot! The million of faithless and untrustworthy Federal employees will be replaced at the beginning of my term in office. There will be no exceptions. There are millions of unemployed birther Patriots that would be willing to accept a Federal job and who would be more deserving.

Of course, the millions of Federal jobs would be removed. The Federal beast that has been created is too vast and too expensive. Federal job replacements would be employed for a 20 hour work week. Our budget for federal employment would be cut by 50% this way. As Commander in Chief, all Military officers would be fired. Their lack of upholding their oath of office would bring treason charges upon themselves. Not a single officer (except Terry Lakin) has honored their oath of office.

All former Congressmen, Senators and Federal Officers would have their pensions and government funds withdrawn because of failure to correct the errors of improper vetting of candidates for Federal office. In addition, anyone that has ever held Federal Office or ever taken a federal office oath of office and NOT SPOKEN UP AGAINST THE FAILURE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUION WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY BACK THE TAX PAYER FUNDS THEY RECEIVED DURING THEIR TENURE.

Lastly, Barack Hussein Soetoro (aka OBAMA) will be deported and returned to Kenya unless he can prove his citizenship to the State of Hawaii.

And lastly, any illegal alien that has not taken the oath of citizenship to remain within in the United States will have a bounty on their head and 50% reward will be paid to any US Citizen that causes the arrest of any illegal alien. The reward will be paid out of asset forfeiture of any property taken from the illegal, or from any church that hides them, or for any business that employs’ them.

This will bring great hardship to those that have gotten us into this mess, but it will solve greater problems later on.

If you wish to save the Constitution and restore it to its proper status then please vote for me as your new President.

Thank you,

[s] Edward C. Noonan
President – 2012
American Independent Party

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

My choice for Vice President - 2012

My good friend in Arizona, Alice, convinced me that I should run for President – 2012. She said I have the best qualifications of all of the political critters that are roaming about in the countryside. She likes my views on securing our borders, placing a bounty on illegal aliens and other border crossing drug lords/felons, and Alice especially likes my views on placing Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO) under citizen’s arrest for squatting in the White House without Constitutional authority. So, I have agreed to become the "BIRTHER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE."

But there is one small problem…No one knows who I am. I ran for Secretary of State in 2002 under the banner of the 3rd largest party in America. But I only got 1.2% of the vote. And then I ran for Governor against muscle-builder turned actor, Arnold Schwarzenegger. If you don’t know who this guy is, then just GOOGLE the words, “nude photo Arnold Schwarzenegger.” Again, I only got .7% of the vote. Finally, in 2010 I ran against “don’t call me Ma’am” Barbara Boxer… and once again, I got only 1.3% of the vote. The international-bankster-run-media, the two big-bucks parties and the powers that be, made sure the elections were rigged and I (and the other three Calfornia ballot-qualified third party candidates) was denied equal access to the political process.

So my friend, Alice and I have been wondering how we can get people to notice me as a candidate in the face of such corrupt political oppression against 3rd parties. We have been brainstorming who we could add to my campaign as my running mate that would attract voters to my campaign and get me noticed as a candidate… We came up with a name or two, but no answer has been forthcoming from them… maybe they don’t want to be embarrassed by running as a third party candidate?

So it finally hit me! I need to get someone that has been on TV in every home of America! I need EXPOSURE by being seen with a recognizable face! Divine inspiration came upon me and I have the perfect person!

My choice is the unnamed, “hottie” on the T-Mobile myTouch 4G Piggyback phone! No one knows her name, but she is some real-sweet eye-candy, right?

In one of her ads, iPhone and the AT&T network are mocked as a haggard pair of piggybacking fellows standing next to HER in her slinky white and pink stripped summer dress.

Whoopie! Could she be my excellent new Vice President running mate or not!?

Instead of iPhone and AT&T, the two Yahoos next to her could be the corrupt GOPs and Dems! LOL!

The LA Times claims she is a Canadian! But so what! Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO) is a Kenyan born foreigner. Soetoro has flashed two bogus American Birth Certifications and both were photoshopped and as phony as a three dollar bill. Even the only two hospitals in Hawaii refuse to claim that he was born in THEIR hospital.

And what about Senator John McCain? He was born in Colon, Panama, across the bay from the Naval base that his father was serving in. And Colon IS NOT PART OF THE PANAMA CANAL ZONE! McCain is a citizen of Panama and has never been naturalized as a citizen of America! So if McCain and Soetoro can illegally run, so can my running mate from Canada!

And additionally, Chester Arthur (Republican) was also not a natural born citizen. He illegally became POTUS in 1881 after the assassination of James Garfield. Chester’s father was not a citizen of America, yet married an American lady. This lady (by law) immediately took on the citizenship of her husband (British)… and then Chester Arthur was born (who was also considered British). Chester Arthur’s father (William Arthur) taught school in Canada for most of his life, and did not become a US naturalized citizen until 1843. However, this did not automatically give Chester Arthur citizenship, because he was 23 when his father became a U.S. citizen. Chester Arthur NEVER became a US Citizen…but became an illegal-alien-president. Our Constitution has never recovered from that rape of our precious document… and neither Congress, nor the Supreme Court, nor the White House has ever complied with the Constitution again since this nightmare of 1881.

So heck with it! My choice for Vice President is CARLY FOULKES. She can be our MYTOUCH candidate. At least, she will be nicer to look at than my 63 year old mug:

If anyone objects…TOUGH! Just go ahead and contact the White House and complain. If they object I will NOT ask Foulkes to run. Until then, start considering VOTING NOONAN & FOULKES for President and Vice President 2012! Else, if any "American" desire to run with me and is better looking than I, please contact me immediately!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
American Independent Party

Monday, August 29, 2011

Is ‘impeachment’ is a valid action?

from: Edward C. Noonan
date: Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:43 AM
subject: Re: DR. EDWIN VIERA: any attempt by the President to usurp any or all of the powers ... would constitute a "high Crime[ ] and Misdemeanor[ ]" for which "Impeachment" and "Conviction" would be appropriate


Both you and Dr. Viera are deadly wrong. You both seem to be implying that there is a REMEDY for this Constitutional crisis that grips this nation? How stupid can you be to sit there and imply there is an "easy" fix to the 150+ years of Constitutional rape that both Republicans and Democrats have perpetrated on the American citizenry? How can you return to 1862 and change the unconstitutional attack on "the Southern states" when the Constitution does not provide authorization to FORCE states to remain in the Union? How can you undo the Republican rape of America by allowing a non-natural born citizen to sit as Vice President, then POTUS? How can you determine if the Statehoods are valid for the 12 states that entered the Union after an non-eligible DE FACTO thug became slime-King in the Cesspool of the White House in 1881 (Chester Arthur)?

And then we have the Democrat rape when they allowed the present illegal alien do the same. Since January 20, 2009 this Kenyan citizen has placed a further stench within the White House. The Congress, Supreme Court and the entire Federal Marxist Government have equally conspired to allow this Kenyan Alien to smell up the already stinking corrupt halls of the den of thieves at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

There is no simple remedy but the only possible remedy would be to amass a million or more ARMED AND OUTRAGED PATRIOTS MARCHING ON WASHINGTON D.C. As long as a single Republican or Democrat remains in power, there will NEVER be an acceptable remedy. When are you going to get your head "out of the sand" and realize AMERICA AND OUR FORMER CONSTITUTION IS OVER for now. Unless we rip it back by the point of a pitchfork we will NEVER be free nor escape the debt slavery that we have been chained with. IMPEACHMENT? What a laugh! So who is going to try the matter? The friggin' Republicans and Democrats that got us to this point in the first place?... And you are going to allow the Chief Supreme Thug Roberts to sit as the JUDGE? The only thing he (or any member of the Supreme Court or FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM) should be able to decide is whether he prefers a blindfold or not at HIS EXECUTION.

I still volunteer to lead the force to Washington DC and arrest the Kenyan alien and all the thousands of Federal goons that brought us to this point. We cannot put new wine in an old bottle. Until you accept this premise, you are only perpetuating the myth that "all is well in Zion." Until you are TRULY ready to drain the cesspool, you will still have nothing but more-of-the-same. Look at the buffoons that are running for President...all merely vow to continue the status quo regarding the Kenyan Marxist in control of our military. Do you really think a single one of them will go on a witch hunt once elected to perform an exorcism on the evil-doers in D.C.? I think not.

Will there be fear if you tell your friendly Congressman that you want to Impeach their Messiah from Kenyan? Not an iota of fear will they have! But if you tell them that YOU ARE COMING ON 11-11-11 to effect an citizen arrest ON THEM and it will be an armed force that is coming. And unless they take action before this date certain, a personal arrest will be performed on them, then nothing will change!...At that point they will have three options:

1) Wait and see what happens.
2) Try to remedy the situation
3) Hide behind their Capitol Police and Riot forces stationed at nearby Army bases.

Of course, 11-11-11 is on a Friday and most Congressional critters will be running home (in their districts) to hide. The only people left in the Capitol will be me and my shadow. But yet, it could be an ARMED event. The Kenyan squatting the the White House will claim he has power via the Constitution to PUT DOWN REBELLIONS:

"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;..."

It will be amusing to see how they can justify "calling forth the Militia" when WE ARE THE MILITIA!

And if there is not a legitimate Commander-in-Chief, the Army is without a leader. How can they constitutionally act?

So unless you join with me on 11-11-11 then you are merely spitting in the wind. Your remedy is worthless and improper. There can be no constitutional "Presidential Impeachment" against a DE FACTO tyrant.

But, Americans are sissies. They fear of losing their place at the public trough. 200,000,000 Federal checks are written each month and the sissies fear of losing their monthly handout.

I will make this wager with you...On this date on Aug 29, 2013 (2 years from today's date) the Soetoro matter will not have been resolved! How much do you want to wager? A diet coke and a steak dinner at Sizzler's?

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012 (if the next election is indeed valid) (which I do not believe it is!)

- Hide quoted text -

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Neil Turner wrote:

Citizens for the Constitution; As many of you know, there has been an on-going discussion and disagreement by various patriots as to whether ‘impeachment’ is a valid action to be brought against the usurper in our White House. The main argument against it is taken from an article written by Dr. Edwin Viera in 2008, BEFORE the usurper was actually ‘certified’ by the electoral college, and before he was ‘sworn in’ by CJ John Roberts. ‘If Obama does become an usurper posturing as "the President," Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be "removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" (see Article II, Section 4).’ Over 3 years have passed, and Dr. Viera has now spoken up and used the dreaded and verboten ‘IMPEACHMENT’ word in his recent article of August 13, 2011, ‘FABLES OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT’: Inasmuch as Article II, Section 3 the Constitution commands the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”—and inasmuch as one of those “Laws” is the Constitution itself—and inasmuch as Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly empowers Congress alone “to enforce” Section 4—it follows that any attempt by the President to usurp any or all of the powers “[t]o borrow Money”, “[t]o lay and collect Taxes”, or to emit fiat currency in order purportedly to enforce Section 4 would constitute a “high Crime[ ] and Misdemeanor[ ]” for which “Impeachment” and “Conviction” would be appropriate, followed by criminal prosecution of both himself and his accomplices. So it would appear that even the erudite Constitutional scholar, Dr. Edwin Viera, has concluded that we must first impeach the usurper, so that he can then be prosecuted and tried for any and all of his ‘high Crimes’ committed while occupying a ‘high’ (elected) office - whether lawfully seated or not. Here are excerpts from the article: FABLES OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

August 13, The more I peruse the current public discourse about the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the present quandary of public debt that confronts this country, the more I am convinced of the wisdom of the observation of the ancients that “Against human stupidity even the immortal gods contend in vain!” The gist of the argument in favor of the Fourteenth Amendment’s positive application rests on the first sentence of Section 4 of the Amendment: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” Supposedly, this sentence grants a power to the President to borrow money in order to pay outstanding “public debt of the United States” as it comes due, even though Congress has not authorized such additional borrowing. Apparently the theory is that, if the President could not exercise this power, some of the debt would be unpaid at maturity, and therefore its “validity” would “be questioned”, in violation of the Amendment. … Read the rest of the article here: And here is where he calls for impeachment: …. Inasmuch as Article II, Section 3 the Constitution commands the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”—and inasmuch as one of those “Laws” is the Constitution itself—and inasmuch as Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly empowers Congress alone “to enforce” Section 4—it follows that any attempt by the President to usurp any or all of the powers “[t]o borrow Money”, “[t]o lay and collect Taxes”, or to emit fiat currency in order purportedly to enforce Section 4 would constitute a “high Crime[ ] and Misdemeanor[ ]” for which “Impeachment” and “Conviction” would be appropriate, followed by criminal prosecution of both himself and his accomplices. And his closing sentence is a real ‘doozy’: One need not be an electrical engineer, therefore, to realize that the legal “bright bulbs” in the White House are running at far below their self-rated wattage. © 2011 Edwin Vieira, Jr. - All Rights Reserved

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School). For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment. So now you know. And now it’s time to put a little fear into the hides of the those we have elected – that their job is on the line (the only thing they seem to care about) if they don’t START the IMPEACHMENT process – NOW! 112TH Congress-members! You start his IMPEACHMENT, or we start your REPLACEMENT! Go here to be able to contact your elected representatives directly – without going through their website: In Liberty. Neil B. TurnerCitizens for the P.S. You can drop this URL ( (linking to the Impeach or Replace poster above) into your email to your Senators and Representative – so they really get the message. They aren’t very much worried about being recalled, but they certainly are concerned about being replaced in their cushy job paying over $14,000 per month – for LIFE!