Monday, August 29, 2011

Is ‘impeachment’ is a valid action?

from: Edward C. Noonan
date: Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:43 AM
subject: Re: DR. EDWIN VIERA: any attempt by the President to usurp any or all of the powers ... would constitute a "high Crime[ ] and Misdemeanor[ ]" for which "Impeachment" and "Conviction" would be appropriate


Both you and Dr. Viera are deadly wrong. You both seem to be implying that there is a REMEDY for this Constitutional crisis that grips this nation? How stupid can you be to sit there and imply there is an "easy" fix to the 150+ years of Constitutional rape that both Republicans and Democrats have perpetrated on the American citizenry? How can you return to 1862 and change the unconstitutional attack on "the Southern states" when the Constitution does not provide authorization to FORCE states to remain in the Union? How can you undo the Republican rape of America by allowing a non-natural born citizen to sit as Vice President, then POTUS? How can you determine if the Statehoods are valid for the 12 states that entered the Union after an non-eligible DE FACTO thug became slime-King in the Cesspool of the White House in 1881 (Chester Arthur)?

And then we have the Democrat rape when they allowed the present illegal alien do the same. Since January 20, 2009 this Kenyan citizen has placed a further stench within the White House. The Congress, Supreme Court and the entire Federal Marxist Government have equally conspired to allow this Kenyan Alien to smell up the already stinking corrupt halls of the den of thieves at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

There is no simple remedy but the only possible remedy would be to amass a million or more ARMED AND OUTRAGED PATRIOTS MARCHING ON WASHINGTON D.C. As long as a single Republican or Democrat remains in power, there will NEVER be an acceptable remedy. When are you going to get your head "out of the sand" and realize AMERICA AND OUR FORMER CONSTITUTION IS OVER for now. Unless we rip it back by the point of a pitchfork we will NEVER be free nor escape the debt slavery that we have been chained with. IMPEACHMENT? What a laugh! So who is going to try the matter? The friggin' Republicans and Democrats that got us to this point in the first place?... And you are going to allow the Chief Supreme Thug Roberts to sit as the JUDGE? The only thing he (or any member of the Supreme Court or FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM) should be able to decide is whether he prefers a blindfold or not at HIS EXECUTION.

I still volunteer to lead the force to Washington DC and arrest the Kenyan alien and all the thousands of Federal goons that brought us to this point. We cannot put new wine in an old bottle. Until you accept this premise, you are only perpetuating the myth that "all is well in Zion." Until you are TRULY ready to drain the cesspool, you will still have nothing but more-of-the-same. Look at the buffoons that are running for President...all merely vow to continue the status quo regarding the Kenyan Marxist in control of our military. Do you really think a single one of them will go on a witch hunt once elected to perform an exorcism on the evil-doers in D.C.? I think not.

Will there be fear if you tell your friendly Congressman that you want to Impeach their Messiah from Kenyan? Not an iota of fear will they have! But if you tell them that YOU ARE COMING ON 11-11-11 to effect an citizen arrest ON THEM and it will be an armed force that is coming. And unless they take action before this date certain, a personal arrest will be performed on them, then nothing will change!...At that point they will have three options:

1) Wait and see what happens.
2) Try to remedy the situation
3) Hide behind their Capitol Police and Riot forces stationed at nearby Army bases.

Of course, 11-11-11 is on a Friday and most Congressional critters will be running home (in their districts) to hide. The only people left in the Capitol will be me and my shadow. But yet, it could be an ARMED event. The Kenyan squatting the the White House will claim he has power via the Constitution to PUT DOWN REBELLIONS:

"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;..."

It will be amusing to see how they can justify "calling forth the Militia" when WE ARE THE MILITIA!

And if there is not a legitimate Commander-in-Chief, the Army is without a leader. How can they constitutionally act?

So unless you join with me on 11-11-11 then you are merely spitting in the wind. Your remedy is worthless and improper. There can be no constitutional "Presidential Impeachment" against a DE FACTO tyrant.

But, Americans are sissies. They fear of losing their place at the public trough. 200,000,000 Federal checks are written each month and the sissies fear of losing their monthly handout.

I will make this wager with you...On this date on Aug 29, 2013 (2 years from today's date) the Soetoro matter will not have been resolved! How much do you want to wager? A diet coke and a steak dinner at Sizzler's?

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012 (if the next election is indeed valid) (which I do not believe it is!)

- Hide quoted text -

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Neil Turner wrote:

Citizens for the Constitution; As many of you know, there has been an on-going discussion and disagreement by various patriots as to whether ‘impeachment’ is a valid action to be brought against the usurper in our White House. The main argument against it is taken from an article written by Dr. Edwin Viera in 2008, BEFORE the usurper was actually ‘certified’ by the electoral college, and before he was ‘sworn in’ by CJ John Roberts. ‘If Obama does become an usurper posturing as "the President," Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be "removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" (see Article II, Section 4).’ Over 3 years have passed, and Dr. Viera has now spoken up and used the dreaded and verboten ‘IMPEACHMENT’ word in his recent article of August 13, 2011, ‘FABLES OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT’: Inasmuch as Article II, Section 3 the Constitution commands the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”—and inasmuch as one of those “Laws” is the Constitution itself—and inasmuch as Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly empowers Congress alone “to enforce” Section 4—it follows that any attempt by the President to usurp any or all of the powers “[t]o borrow Money”, “[t]o lay and collect Taxes”, or to emit fiat currency in order purportedly to enforce Section 4 would constitute a “high Crime[ ] and Misdemeanor[ ]” for which “Impeachment” and “Conviction” would be appropriate, followed by criminal prosecution of both himself and his accomplices. So it would appear that even the erudite Constitutional scholar, Dr. Edwin Viera, has concluded that we must first impeach the usurper, so that he can then be prosecuted and tried for any and all of his ‘high Crimes’ committed while occupying a ‘high’ (elected) office - whether lawfully seated or not. Here are excerpts from the article: FABLES OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

August 13, The more I peruse the current public discourse about the application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the present quandary of public debt that confronts this country, the more I am convinced of the wisdom of the observation of the ancients that “Against human stupidity even the immortal gods contend in vain!” The gist of the argument in favor of the Fourteenth Amendment’s positive application rests on the first sentence of Section 4 of the Amendment: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” Supposedly, this sentence grants a power to the President to borrow money in order to pay outstanding “public debt of the United States” as it comes due, even though Congress has not authorized such additional borrowing. Apparently the theory is that, if the President could not exercise this power, some of the debt would be unpaid at maturity, and therefore its “validity” would “be questioned”, in violation of the Amendment. … Read the rest of the article here: And here is where he calls for impeachment: …. Inasmuch as Article II, Section 3 the Constitution commands the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”—and inasmuch as one of those “Laws” is the Constitution itself—and inasmuch as Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly empowers Congress alone “to enforce” Section 4—it follows that any attempt by the President to usurp any or all of the powers “[t]o borrow Money”, “[t]o lay and collect Taxes”, or to emit fiat currency in order purportedly to enforce Section 4 would constitute a “high Crime[ ] and Misdemeanor[ ]” for which “Impeachment” and “Conviction” would be appropriate, followed by criminal prosecution of both himself and his accomplices. And his closing sentence is a real ‘doozy’: One need not be an electrical engineer, therefore, to realize that the legal “bright bulbs” in the White House are running at far below their self-rated wattage. © 2011 Edwin Vieira, Jr. - All Rights Reserved

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School). For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment. So now you know. And now it’s time to put a little fear into the hides of the those we have elected – that their job is on the line (the only thing they seem to care about) if they don’t START the IMPEACHMENT process – NOW! 112TH Congress-members! You start his IMPEACHMENT, or we start your REPLACEMENT! Go here to be able to contact your elected representatives directly – without going through their website: In Liberty. Neil B. TurnerCitizens for the P.S. You can drop this URL ( (linking to the Impeach or Replace poster above) into your email to your Senators and Representative – so they really get the message. They aren’t very much worried about being recalled, but they certainly are concerned about being replaced in their cushy job paying over $14,000 per month – for LIFE!

Wednesday, August 24, 2011


boun•ty (ba n ti) [boun-tee]
noun, plural -ties.
1. a premium or reward, especially one offered by a government: There was a bounty on his head. Some states offer a bounty for dead coyotes.

I propose that a BOUNTY be placed on the head of all illegal aliens in the United States. It is clear that our nation has been flooded with characters of ill-repute. It is so bad that it cannot be determined who is a vicious criminal, and who is just an illegal border jumper.

In addition, the Mexican Government cannot seem to be able to manage the criminal element within their borders. Recently 151 vicious criminals escaped from one of their prisons and seemed to have migrated immediately to the United States.

There is no definite accounting of how many of the hundreds of thousands of Mexican criminals have infiltrated across our borders.

We demand that a bounty on ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS be offered immediately by both the Mexican Government and the United States Government.

A bounty of 50% of all assets of an illegal should be offered to insure that any person desiring to become an illegal alien bounty hunter should be able to make a lucrative living.

There should be no differentiation between an escaped Mexican murder fugitive and a common illegal border crosser…both are law breakers and both have no concern for American law.

Any U.S. Business that hires a border fugitive will also be liable for asset forfeiture. The business that condones illegal border crossings will forfeit 100% of their business assets and 50% will be paid to the Bounty Hunter that aids in the apprehension of that business who harbored an illegal alien.

There should be ZERO TOLERANCE for illegal border crossings from any country in the world into the United States.

Also see:


I have been asked, “what are my views on drilling for oil.” It seems to be a pretty simple question and I have a pretty simple answer… “we should DRILL, BABY, DRILL!”

But there is one slight problem...The US Constitution gives neither the Congress nor White House any oversight concern oil production, nor energy in general...but it is my understanding that the White House can do all it wants to convince the "States" to get off their sleeping-cots and start producing sufficient amounts of energy for our homes and factories!

This chant (Drill, Baby, Drill) seems to have been promoted by the GOP National Chairman in 2008…but of course, the GOP was more silent in times past. The GOP allowed the far left to dominate the US oil production agenda and the Green Party has pretty much curtailed the production of oil in America. So we have sold our souls to the Saudis and other Muslim countries. Hence, we pay $3 - $4 per gallon for gasoline where we should only pay less than .99¢ a gallon or less.

The best that I can find when I research this matter is that we use about 10-20 million barrels of oil per day. This is for gasoline, heating, and our other energy needs. The best guess that I can find about how much OIL IS IN THE GROUND in the U.S. is about 35 billion barrels.

This, would mean that we have about 1,750 days worth of our own oil that we could use before we run out. (This is what the Oil industry claims.)

On the other hand, people like Lindsey Williams claims that the oil people have told him we have 200 years of oil hiding underneath the surface of the United States. If we use 20 million barrels a day and there are 200 years worth of oil, this would imply there is 1.5 Trillion barrels of oil beneath our feet.

I cannot be certain that 1.5 Trillion barrels are really available, but this is the claim that is being made.

What I do know for a fact, is that Methane which is what natural gas is made of, is available by the quadrillion tons. It is being mostly ignored, because it is so plentiful and the extreme profits cannot be made by those who desire exceedingly great wealth.

Methane is abundant throughout space. Research is being conducted by NASA on methane's potential as a rocket fuel. One advantage of methane is that it is abundant in many parts of the solar system and it could potentially be harvested in situ (i.e. on the surface of another solar-system body), providing fuel for a return journey.

There is trillions of barrels of methane floating around in our own atmosphere. As it also does in the atmosphere of the planet Mars. Methane belches out of both of and Mars as well as many other near-by planets.

Earth in comparison to Jupiter… (our big Methane gas station!)

Jupiter and Saturn have methane deposits in their atmospheres. So if earth ever stopped producing her quadrillion tons of methane every day, then we have a vast quantity of natural gas (aka methane) in our neighbors in outer space.

And then again, we have an unlimited supply of Hydrogen and Oxygen. Both of these elements can never be exhausted by mankind. We could not ever convert enough hydrogen from our 3/5th planet that is covered by water to ever run out of this valuable resource.

The mainstream media claim that the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, plus the cash we have spent on the Libyan war totals nearly 1.2 TRILLION dollars in the last 10 years.

If we had used this money instead to discover a cheap way to convert to a hydrogen engine (or methane engine) we would be no longer dependent on Libyan oil, or Saudi oil, or even Iranian oil. We could tell them to go, take a hike!

So should we DRILL, BABY, DRILL? Yes! By all means!… And at the same time, we need to learn to convert the hydrogen or the methane into a viable energy source. And when we do, we will break away from our slave masters who chain us to the gasoline engine… and who forbid us to drill for our own oil in our own country.

Remember, the word DRILL has two meanings:

1. to make (a hole) by boring.
2. to impart (knowledge) by strict training, discipline, or repetition.

We need to use more of the 2nd definition and less of the 1st!

Edward C. Noonan
President – 2012


Body of the TEXT of Orly Taitz's Hawaiian Ineligibility Case:

(Orly Taitz v STATE OF HAWAII)


This court has jurisdiction, as the defendants Loretta Fuddy, in her official capacity as the Director of Health, State of HI Department of Health (Hereinafter “Fuddy”, and Alvin T. Onaka, Regisgtrar of the Department of Health (hereinafter “Onaka”) are located at 1250 Punchbowl street within Jurisdiction the First Circuit Court of the State of HI. Governing Statute Unified Information Practices Act, as codified in statute 92F


Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, Attorney Pro Se, President of the “Defend Our Freedoms” foundation


Ms. Loretta Fuddy, Director of Health, Department of Health, state of HI.

Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, Registrar Department of Health, State of HI Factual allegations

1. Defendant Fuddy in her official capacity as Director of Health is a custodian of the original birth records of individuals born in HI, or individuals born abroad, who received Hawaiian birth certificates pursuant to statute 338-17, as well as Late Birth Records, created later in life under statute 338-6 when the original birth records are not available.

2. Defendant, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, in his official capacity as the registrar of the Department of Health is the state of Hawaii official responsible for the authentication of the original records and the certified copies of the original records.

3. Under Article 2, section one of the Constitution of the United States President of the United states has to be the “natural born citizen” of the United States of America.

4. Article 2 section one is the only law/statute governing the eligibility of the President of the United States. U. S. Constitution is the Supreme law of the land, which supersedes any state statutes. No state statute, no state claim of privacy can supersede the requirement of the of the US Constitution for the President to be “Natural born” or de facto invalidate the Constitutional requirement by refusing to provide access and right for inspection of the admissible competent evidence of Natural Born status.

5. Fourteenth amendment of the Constitution does not provide definition of the “Natural Born citizen” as it relates only to the requirements of the citizenships and not “Natural Born Citizen” for the purpose of the qualification for the presidency of the United States.

6. “Natural Born Citizen” is different from “Native Born Citizen” and “Citizen at birth”

7. Citizen at birth provides one citizenship based on law or statute, regardless, whether born in the United States or not.

8. Native born Citizen is one born in the country, but might allow for split allegiance to other sovereignties.

9. “Natural Born Citizen” is the form of citizenship with the highest requirements of allegiance, based on “Jus Solis” and “Jus Sanquinis”, born in the country with allegiance by blood (inherited from both parents”.

10. Only one person at a time is required to possess this highest form of allegiance and citizenship- President of the United States. Such highest form of allegiance was sought by the framers of the United States Constitution in order to assure an undivided allegiance of the President of the United States of America and the Commander in Chief.

11. Barack Hussein Obama, currently occupying the position of the President of the United States, claims to be born in the state of Hawaii and claims the original typewritten long form birth certificate, created in 1961, is on file and in custody of the Defendants.

12. For nearly three years Mr. Obama refused to release his original long form birth certificate with the name of the doctor, hospital, registrar and other pertinent information.

13. Multiple individuals, including members of the US military demanded to see the long form birth certificate to make sure, that Mr. Obama is indeed qualified for the position of the P{resident of the United States and Commander in Chief.

14. Highly decorated U.S. Army officer, Bronze star recipient, flight surgeon LT. Col. Terrence Lakin was court martialed and spent six month in Fort Leavenworth military prison for demanding to see verification of legitimacy of Mr. Obama, as the president of the United States. In spite of thousands of requests for Mr. Obama to provide his long form birth certificate and spare a decorated officer, he refused to do so and in December of 2010 Lt. Col. Lakin was sent to prison.

15. Plaintiff herein is an attorney who represents other clients, questioning Mr. Obama’s legitimacy to presidency, among theM former UN ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes, 10 State Representatives from around the Nation and over 200 members of the military, going up in rank to Major General. She was named by the media “Queen of the Birthers”, leader of the dissident movement, questioning Barack Hussein Obama’s legitimacy to the US Presidency.

16. Plaintiff and her clients were viciously attacked, defamed and persecuted for demanding to see the original record, which is the basis of Mr. Obama’s eligibility to the U.S. Presidency.

17. On May 2, 2011 Taitz was scheduled to appear in oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Barnett, Keyes et al v Obama 10-55084, seeking access and inspection of Mr. Obama’s original 1961 long form birth certificate, kept on file in care of the defendants.

18. On April 27, 2011, only a few days before the scheduled oral argument in the Ninth Circuit court of Appeals , Mr. Obama held a public press conference, where he disclosed, what he claimed to be the certified copy of the original Birth Certificate. At the same press conference Mr. Obama attacked individuals, seeking verification of his records, calling them “side show, carnival barkers” and stating, that we have more important things to do.

This appearance was certain to influence the three judge panel of Hon. Berzon, Hon. Pregerson and Hon. Fisher of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, getting ready to hear the oral argument in Barnett, Keyes v Obama and was calculated to send the message, that the original long form birth certificate was disclosed to the public and the whole issue is moot. This cheap performance by Mr. Obama was also calculated to create a mass hysteria of further persecutions and harassment of the Plaintiff and her clients.

19. Shortly after Mr. Obama disclosed an alleged certified copy of his birth certificate and posted it on the official web site, for the whole world to see, Taitz started getting multiple affidavits of experts, attesting to the fact, that the document disclosed by Mr. Obama to the world and posted on line is a computer generated forgery.

20. Mr. Felicito Papa, an expert in Adobe software provided an affidavit and exhibits, showing that the document in question was computer generated and shows different layers of computer images, that were used and compiled together in order to create this “birth certificate”. Exhibit 1.

20. Mr. Paul Irey , an expert in typesetting with over 50 years of experience, provided an affidavit, showing that the letters and numbers in the document came from multiple different typesetting, which is a clear evidence of forgery. Exhibit 2

21. Mr. Douglas Vogt, a 40 year expert in scanners and printers provided evidence of a mixture of different inks, kerning, gray scale mixed with color, mixture of ink writing and computer generated graphics, showing the document to be forged. Exhibit 3.

22. Alleged certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate showed serial number 10641 and date of issuance 08.08.1961, which was completely out of order with previously made public certifications of Susan and Gretchen Nordyke, bearing serial numbers 10638 and 10639, even though issued on 08.11.1961, three days earlier.

23. Individuals, who do not posses valid birth certificates cannot obtain valid social security numbers. From February 2011 until now Taitz is prosecuting a 5 USC 552 Freedom of Information case Taitz v Astrue 11-402 RCL, USDC District of Columbia, where Taitz provided Obama’s Selective service certificate, showing him using Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 (Exhibit 4 ) and Social Security Verification Systems letter, showing that this number was never assigned to Obama. This provides further evidence, that Barack Obama does not have a valid birth certificate and does not have a valid social security number assigned to him.

24. Similarly, Taitz obtained verification from the Student Clearing house, showing Obama attending Columbia University only for 9 months, which contradicts Obama’s public statements, where he claims to attend Columbia for two years. All of this information show a pattern of fraud and lack of valid vital records.

25. On May 4 of 2011, Taitz sent certified mail requests to defendant Loretta Fuddy, director of Health and defendant Onaka, requesting inspection of Obama’s 1961 original birth certificate under Unified Information Practices act of HI, codified as 92F,

26. Taitz received a response from Alvin T. Onaka, dated May 19, 2011, whereby Onaka stated, that he is responding on behalf of Fuddy and his own behalf and refused to allow inspection, citing privacy concerns and state statute HRS-§338-18

27. Taitz requested an administrative appeal and reconsideration, due to the fact, that Obama already waived any claims of privacy in regards to his long form birth certificate by disclosing it to the public and posting it on the official website

28. From the beginning of June, for a period of three month, there was no response to the request for the administrative appeal, which is tantamount to a denial of the request for the appeal.

28. Knowing, that the certificate of live birth posted on Taitz is a forgery according to experts, Taitz looked for a possible source of the serial number 10641 used on that birth certificate.

29. A long time close friend of Obama is a known domestic terrorist William Ayers, leader of the terrorist organization “Weathermen”, which was responsible for some 110 bombings around the country in the early 70s, among them bombings of the Pentagon, Capitol, New York city police headquarters and military barracks.

30 Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dorn were on the run for ten years and needed forged and fraudulently obtained vital records.

31. In his book Fugitive Days Ayers described his methods of obtaining fraudulent vital records, among them search of the graves of the deceased infants and use of their birth certificate numbers.

32. On August 4, 1961, same day, as the alleged date of birth of Obama, an infant by name Virginia Sunahara was born at the Wahiana hospital in Honolulu.

Due to health problems she was immediately transferred to the Kapiolani hospital, where she died next day, on August 5, 1961. Hi state archives show her birth and death listed among ones born and one deceased in 1961, but repeated request for her birth certificate yielded a response, that there is no birth certificate on file. While it could be understandable for the Health Department to respond, that the record is not available due to privacy, it is suspicious, that the Health department responded to the petitioners, that it does not exist.

33. On June 4, 2011 Taitz requested from defendant Fuddy a certified copy of Sunahara’s birth certificate, but Fuddy did not respond.

34. As of now defendants did not allow examination of the original long form birth certificate for either Obama or Sunahara. Complaint for petition for the Writ of Mandamus, request to allow inspection

Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of previous paragraphs as if fully plead herein.

Hawaii Unified Information Practices act UIPA, as codified under 92F allows the public at large inspection of records in custody of the state agencies, unless such records are protected by local privacy codes.

Obama has already waived any claims of privacy in relation to the original long form birth certificate, as he personally disclosed the document and posted it on the official White house internet site easily accessible by any US or foreign citizen.

Additionally Obama expressly waived any privacy concerns by and through his private attorney, Judith Corley, who personally signed a waiver of any privacy concerns in her letter to defendant Fuddy. “We understand that the Department of Health has adopted this policy for sound administrative reasons. However, we are writing to request a waiver of the Department of Health’s policy, so that my client can obtain two certified copies of his original, “long form” birth certificate. Waiver of the Department policy in this instance would allow my client to make a certified copy of his original birth certificate publicly available and would also relieve the burden currently being placed on the Department of Health by the numerous inquiries it receives from the media and others relating to my client’s birth record.” Id Exhibit 6 Letter from Judith Corley, private attorney for Obama, requesting waiver of privacy for purposes of disclosure of Obama’s original birth certificate. Emphasis added. Defendant Fuddy agreed to such public disclosure and wrote in her April 25th letter to Obama: “We hope that issuing you these copies of your original Certificate of Live Birth will end the numerous inquiries received by the Hawaii Department of Health to produce this document…Enclosed please find two certified copies of your Certificate of Live birth. I have witnessed the copying of the certificate and attest to the authenticity of these copies” . As such, Fuddy acknowledged her understanding, that the document in question will be made public and the subject of this document and his attorney consented to public disclosure. Privacy is no longer at issue, however computer generated forgery is at issue and the public at large is entitled to know, whether Fuddy is telling the truth and whether indeed the document on file is the same forgery as the one posted on the If the document on file is the same forgery, immediate criminal investigation, as well as congressional hearing on constitutional eligibility of Mr. Obama will need to commence.

§ 92F-2. states the following:
Purposes; rules of construction

In a democracy, the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power. Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy. Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public’s interest. Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy–the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies–shall be conducted as openly as possible.

The policy of conducting government business as openly as possible must be tempered by a recognition of the right of the people to privacy, as embodied in section 6 and section 7 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of Hawaii.

This chapter shall be applied and construed to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are to:

(1) Promote the public interest in disclosure;

(2) Provide for accurate, relevant, timely, and complete government records;

(3) Enhance governmental accountability through a general policy of access to government records;

(4) Make government accountable to individuals in the collection, use, and dissemination of information relating to them; and

(5) Balance the individual privacy interest and the public access interest, allowing access unless it would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
The intent of the legislature is to provide transparency and public access to information, while balancing it with concerns of privacy of the individuals, who wish their information to remain private. As Obama has expressly indicate through his personal attorney Judith Corley and through his release of the document in question to the public, he does not wish the document to remain private. As such there is no justification for defendant’s refusal to allow inspection of the document in question.

While prior to April 27, 2011 release of the document in question, defendants were justified in protecting privacy of the document in question, citing HRS §338-18, as confirmed in Justice v Fuddy, after April 27, 2011 HRS § 338-18 can no longer be used as the justification for refusal.

Wherefore Plaintiff respectfully seeks a Writ of Mandamus, advising the defendants, that:

1 Person of interest, whose long form birth certificate is sought has waived any claims of privacy by making a public disclosure of the document in question during his press conference on April 27, 2011.

2. After April 27, 2011 §338-18 no longer applies to the long form birth certificate sought and Defendants erred in refusing to allow inspection based on above statute.

3. Defendants are obligated to allow Plaintiff inspection of the long form birth certificate sought under Unified Information Practices Act chapter 92f of Hawaii Revised statutes.

4 Defendants are liable to the plaintiff for all costs and fees associated with this action.

Respectfully submitted
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO) is not a Natural Born Citizen!



I, Edward C. Noonan, Candidate for President - 2012, declare that Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama has not properly proved that he is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Nor has he proved sufficiently that he is a CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES.

A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is one that was born of TWO US CITIZENS and born in the United States.

Mr. Soetoro did not have a father that was a US Citizen. Hence he cannot be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. And can NEVER hold the office of president.

Mr. Soetoro was given his Indonesian citizenship after his mother gave up her American citizenship and surrendered her passport. Soetoro/Obama has never proved he legally re-entered the United States and had his US Citizenship restored.

My number one issue for my entire campaign and my entire term of office as President will be to bring Barry Soetoro, A.K.A. Barack Hussein Obama to justice as a traitor and charge him with treason and fraud. There is no other issue in America that is more important. We have no qualified President therefore Congress and the Supreme Court can NOT conduct any sort of business until we get this mess sorted out. IT'S LIKE SAYING...WE HAVE NO QUORUM!


[s] Edward C. Noonan for President 2012

See the Natural Born Citizen research of the following Attorneys:

Gary Kreep, Esq.
Phil Berg, Esq.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.

Join my Posse…
Donation Amount:
$25.00 Bumper Sticker
$100 Webinar ticket – Contact for available dates
$1000 Mr. Noonan will be a guest on your Webinar
$2000 Mr. Noonan will speak at your luncheon in person

Contact Mr. Noonan: Leave Comment below!

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

States have a right to admit illegal aliens to their states....(or not!)

The U.S. Constitution is absolutely clear that the States HAVE A RIGHT TO ADMIT "OR NOT" any person requesting migration status. The Constitution states:
Article I - Section 9 - Limits on Congress

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

This section forbids Congress to interfere with migration of illegal aliens to any state of the Union unless that state shall “think it proper.” The only thing that Congress is allowed to do, it to comply with Section 8:To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization.” And too, they can charge a Federal $10 fee for each alien that is admitted.

The 14th Amendment seems to say that now there are two types of Citizens… a FEDERAL citizen which is under the Jurisdiction of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and then a State citizen. The 14th Amendment states:

“1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;…”

But this clause in no way gives ILLEGAL ALIENS the pretend rights of legal entry into America as they currently seem to have.

It is clear that the Federal government has used various DE FACTO schemes to assert their control over who States can allow to be "State citizens" by forcing DE FACTO citizenship to be granted. The U.S. Constitution grants no such broad bestowal of US Citizenship.

Equal State citizenship rights are given to all CITIZENS of all 50 states… yet it does not give such citizenship to illegal aliens as well…

Article IV – Section 2 - State citizens:

“The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”

But nowhere in the U.S. Constitution is Congress or the Federal Government allowed to mandate any State to give citizenship to any person or group of persons without abiding by the proper “rules of naturalization.”

And too, it is the STATE that issues a birth certificate as proof of citizenship. If illegal aliens do not have a BIRTH CERTIFICATE then there is no PROOF of birth in the state, nor within the United States. And it is the state that is responsible to determine if the birth was "under the jurisdiction" of the United States. A birth right baby has no claim to jurisdiction, if they were illegally in the United States, or had illegal paperwork proving that they were granted legal access for a valid border crossing.

Those Federal harlots who have violated the Constitution must be brought to justice!

Edward C. Noonan
2012 President

3000+ County Campaign Chairmen needed - - 50 State Campaign Chairs needed!

I just ordered the papers from the California Secretary of State to run for President 2012.

Do I have a chance? I don't know, but it's better than just sitting around and whining.

I need a State Campaign Chairman in all 50 states. I need a county campaign chairmen in each county in all 50 states. I am offering this position to YOU!

My two big issues:

#1: Bringing the illegal alien sitting in the White House to justice
#2: Securing our borders - - and then deporting 20-30 million illegal aliens back to where they came.

I plan to bring the Federal Government to its knees. How? By VETOING all bills brought to my Oval Office desk. And if the matter is so important, then it will need 2/3rds of the vote of Congress to override my veto. I can guarantee you that after 4 years of 100% vetos, the federal beast will be gutted and tamed. Hopefully the states and counties will be strong enough to regain their sovereignty and once again be prosperous and independent of the past enslavement by the greedy international banksters.

My first appointment will be G. Edward Griffin as FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIR. Wouldn't that be a kick in the onions to the Rothschild family?! Once the FED is brought under control, the prosperity of America would return and jobs, and home ownership would be affordable once more. Until then, the wealth of our nation will continue to be siphoned off and end up in the coffers of China and other conspiring nations.

So, if you are independent and can wean yourself away from the the two BIG-BUCK parties then I need you!

Let me know!

Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012

I'm The First Declared "BIRTHER" Presidential Candidate!

I believe I am the first declared "birther" candidate for President 2012. None of the GOP candidates want to touch this issue with a 10 foot pole. Bachmann, Romney, and especially Ron Paul have run from this matter for nearlly 3 years now. They have their heads hidden in the sand like rest of America.

This "birther" issue is not well supported. In Georgia this Monday, only 12 souls came to the capitol to protest the lack of action on the new state legislation to force the state to vet the President properly.

Not all 12 attendees are shown in this photo...

I am running on the "birther" issue as my primary focus. If we do not have a legitimate Commander-in-chief and POTUS, then nothing that has transpired in the last 3 years matters because it is all void!

My secondary issue, is of course, to secure our borders. Some people claim that 30,000,000 illegal aliens have taken over our country. When elected President I will deport all 30,000,000 million... and I will put a bounty on each illegal. Those that turn in an illegal will obtain a 50% bounty of the wealth and stolen US/State Property that was pillfered by these illegals. Harsh? Darn right! Mexico puts illegal U.S. born citizens that are in their country in prison for many years!

A bounty on illegals and a bounty on US businesses that hire them will bring prosperity back to many Americans. This should be a warning to all the businesses that hire illegals. YOU WILL LOSE ALL YOUR ASSETS when you are caught.

A 50% bounty will be a boon to the 10% of Americans that have no job nor a home anymore.

It's time to get tough!

Edward C. Noonan for President

My 11 Plank Platform:


Attack Mr. Soetoro's (aka BHO) Phony Natural Born Citizen Status.


Revoke the unconstitutional
Federal Reserve System and IRS


$1,000,000 to EVERY married couple in U.S.A.


American to ever be tax-raped again - (Tax foreigners!)


Deport all
foreigners! (Until US economy recovers.)


Interest Rates over 1%


Intra-State & International Corporations in U.S.


No more
laws or agencies not authorized by Constitution.


all public tax money going to foreign nations.


non-citizens from holding elected Office.
20 hour work-weeks for MOST government workers.