Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Friday, October 7, 2011
Re: Fw: REPUBLICANS = HARLOTS OF HELL - answer to another comment
from: Edward C. Noonan ednoonan7@gmail.com
to: Rich
date: Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:40 AM
subject: Re: Fw: REPUBLICANS = HARLOTS OF HELL
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Nancy:
You make it sound like you are a Christian and live your life according to the Gospel. But I fear that you deny the Gospel and you deny the teachings of Jesus Christ.
And your words condemn your own beliefs and concepts that you pretend to have. You say, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles."
Here you are implying that "the Republican Party has LEFT THEIR FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES!" How can you return to something that you have not left behind. I have been listening to this stupid retort since 1992. This was the day I got so outraged at the evil moron (Bill Clinton) in the White House that I became politically involved. For nearly 20 years of my life I have been hearing how the Republican Party will "return to their original principles." But every year the status quo continues and it gets worse and worse and worse.
Let me ask you this. Has the Republican Party be very vocal about the sodomite issue this year? Pray tell which of you REPUBLICAN HARLOTS (of Lucifer) have been out pounding the pavement to gain public support to keep the sodomites out of the military? What have YOU done as a Christian? Or are you like most of the churches of today that welcome the sodomites into their ministry and their high leadership? I know we must “preach the gospel” to these sodomites, but we should not welcome them as Pastors and Bishops of our church. Or, are you like the Catholic church that finds pedophiles to be acceptable and should be welcomed into their parishes?
Congress now has a SODOMITE CAUCUS to support and promote the sodomite causes.
Wikipedia states:
“The LGBT Equality Caucus formation was announced on June 4, 2008, by openly gay representatives Tammy Baldwin and Barney Frank.[1][2] The caucus has 96 members in the 112th United States Congress (94 Democrats and 2 Republicans)[3] and had 91 members (90 Democrats and 1 Republican) during the 111th United States Congress.[4] The caucus is co-chaired by Congress's four openly gay members: Representatives Tammy Baldwin, Barney Frank, Jared Polis and David Cicilline.”
And here in California... the Sodomites have won the hearts of Californians to "teach Sodomite history and 'appreciation'" to the school children, K-12 grades. As a Christian what have you done to fight this evil in Amerika?
And here you sit and complain and whine about me using the words WHORE AND HARLOT and you don’t have a single murmur about Congressional Sodomites, pedophiles and anal-sex promoters? Gimme a break!
And let’s speak on the subject of the 55-60 million murders of unborn citizens…
The Preamble of our constitution states the purpose of our Constitution is to: “…promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…”
Who is our POSTERITY? Is it our unborn? Yes it is! If our constitution protects the welfare and liberty of our posterity…why do you allow them to be murdered without a loud outcry? Would a follower of Jesus Christ murder their future children or would such a person fit the profile as a HARLOT OF SATAN?
You say, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles." What you should be saying is, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its Christian principles."
You get the point… I say, if the shoe fits…WEAR IT! If not, then come on board and help me fight the evil. Else shut up and go back to sleep!
Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
- Hide quoted text -
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Rich wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Nancy
To: Rich
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: REPUBLICANS = HARLOTS OF HELL
Hi Rich,
I am an American who firmly believes in the Constitutional Republic we are suppose to be living in and under. I suppose I should change my "party" affiliation to "Independent" in order to be pleasing. However, I don't do things just to be found pleasing to people. I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles. When and if I find it necessary to change my party, I will do so. The key word I want to emphasize in your note is "seem." I'm confident you're not referring to me as a "HARLOT OF HELL." I haven't sold my soul. And I know many Republicans who haven't either.
I don't know why in this world Mr. Noonan concerns himself wih being offensive. Both words are equally offensive. I know you like this man, Mr. Noonan. I'm sure he is a good man and means well, but I find the way he words things, as correct as he may be, to be reflective of the base culture in which we live. He is therefore, in my opinion,at times offensive. This language may seem to be effective to some, but it doesn't to me. One can make the same point without morphing, in some ways, into the very culture he is slamming.
Jesus called the Pharisees and Sadducees "snakes" and "vipers." He didn't mince words! But He never lowered Himself to become like the culture he condemned! I would also like to note, as well, that a Harlot (Prostitute), Rahab (Joshua 2; 6:22 ~ 25; Hebrews 11:31 (Hebrews 11 is the great Faith chapter of the entire Bible); James 2:25), the one who hid the spies, appears in the very line of Christ! She was the mother of Boaz (Ruth) and appears in the lineage of the Lord Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:5 ~ 16; Luke 3:23 ~ 32)!!! Boaz was the wealthy Bethlehemite who showed favor to Ruth (Ruth 2), married her (Ruth 4), and in so doing became her "kinsman redeemer." (A type of Christ....redeeming all of us!) Boaz was an ancestor of David (Ruth 4:18 ~ 22); I Chronicles 2:12 ~ 15).
My point is that Mr. Noonan and others should be careful with their choice of words lest he and others become like the very ones they're condemning; i. e., "prostituting" themselves and, as a result, being less effective than they might otherwise be.
Thanks for waking me up! Hope you're having a good day!
Nancy
to: Rich
date: Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:40 AM
subject: Re: Fw: REPUBLICANS = HARLOTS OF HELL
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Nancy:
You make it sound like you are a Christian and live your life according to the Gospel. But I fear that you deny the Gospel and you deny the teachings of Jesus Christ.
And your words condemn your own beliefs and concepts that you pretend to have. You say, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles."
Here you are implying that "the Republican Party has LEFT THEIR FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES!" How can you return to something that you have not left behind. I have been listening to this stupid retort since 1992. This was the day I got so outraged at the evil moron (Bill Clinton) in the White House that I became politically involved. For nearly 20 years of my life I have been hearing how the Republican Party will "return to their original principles." But every year the status quo continues and it gets worse and worse and worse.
Let me ask you this. Has the Republican Party be very vocal about the sodomite issue this year? Pray tell which of you REPUBLICAN HARLOTS (of Lucifer) have been out pounding the pavement to gain public support to keep the sodomites out of the military? What have YOU done as a Christian? Or are you like most of the churches of today that welcome the sodomites into their ministry and their high leadership? I know we must “preach the gospel” to these sodomites, but we should not welcome them as Pastors and Bishops of our church. Or, are you like the Catholic church that finds pedophiles to be acceptable and should be welcomed into their parishes?
Congress now has a SODOMITE CAUCUS to support and promote the sodomite causes.
Wikipedia states:
“The LGBT Equality Caucus formation was announced on June 4, 2008, by openly gay representatives Tammy Baldwin and Barney Frank.[1][2] The caucus has 96 members in the 112th United States Congress (94 Democrats and 2 Republicans)[3] and had 91 members (90 Democrats and 1 Republican) during the 111th United States Congress.[4] The caucus is co-chaired by Congress's four openly gay members: Representatives Tammy Baldwin, Barney Frank, Jared Polis and David Cicilline.”
And here in California... the Sodomites have won the hearts of Californians to "teach Sodomite history and 'appreciation'" to the school children, K-12 grades. As a Christian what have you done to fight this evil in Amerika?
And here you sit and complain and whine about me using the words WHORE AND HARLOT and you don’t have a single murmur about Congressional Sodomites, pedophiles and anal-sex promoters? Gimme a break!
And let’s speak on the subject of the 55-60 million murders of unborn citizens…
The Preamble of our constitution states the purpose of our Constitution is to: “…promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…”
Who is our POSTERITY? Is it our unborn? Yes it is! If our constitution protects the welfare and liberty of our posterity…why do you allow them to be murdered without a loud outcry? Would a follower of Jesus Christ murder their future children or would such a person fit the profile as a HARLOT OF SATAN?
You say, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles." What you should be saying is, " I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its Christian principles."
You get the point… I say, if the shoe fits…WEAR IT! If not, then come on board and help me fight the evil. Else shut up and go back to sleep!
Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
- Hide quoted text -
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Rich
----- Original Message -----
From: Nancy
To: Rich
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: REPUBLICANS = HARLOTS OF HELL
Hi Rich,
I am an American who firmly believes in the Constitutional Republic we are suppose to be living in and under. I suppose I should change my "party" affiliation to "Independent" in order to be pleasing. However, I don't do things just to be found pleasing to people. I am hoping to be one of the many who want to return the Republican Party to its foundational principles. When and if I find it necessary to change my party, I will do so. The key word I want to emphasize in your note is "seem." I'm confident you're not referring to me as a "HARLOT OF HELL." I haven't sold my soul. And I know many Republicans who haven't either.
I don't know why in this world Mr. Noonan concerns himself wih being offensive. Both words are equally offensive. I know you like this man, Mr. Noonan. I'm sure he is a good man and means well, but I find the way he words things, as correct as he may be, to be reflective of the base culture in which we live. He is therefore, in my opinion,at times offensive. This language may seem to be effective to some, but it doesn't to me. One can make the same point without morphing, in some ways, into the very culture he is slamming.
Jesus called the Pharisees and Sadducees "snakes" and "vipers." He didn't mince words! But He never lowered Himself to become like the culture he condemned! I would also like to note, as well, that a Harlot (Prostitute), Rahab (Joshua 2; 6:22 ~ 25; Hebrews 11:31 (Hebrews 11 is the great Faith chapter of the entire Bible); James 2:25), the one who hid the spies, appears in the very line of Christ! She was the mother of Boaz (Ruth) and appears in the lineage of the Lord Jesus Christ (Matthew 1:5 ~ 16; Luke 3:23 ~ 32)!!! Boaz was the wealthy Bethlehemite who showed favor to Ruth (Ruth 2), married her (Ruth 4), and in so doing became her "kinsman redeemer." (A type of Christ....redeeming all of us!) Boaz was an ancestor of David (Ruth 4:18 ~ 22); I Chronicles 2:12 ~ 15).
My point is that Mr. Noonan and others should be careful with their choice of words lest he and others become like the very ones they're condemning; i. e., "prostituting" themselves and, as a result, being less effective than they might otherwise be.
Thanks for waking me up! Hope you're having a good day!
Nancy
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Independent Conservatives = 32% of Arizona Tea Party
Last week George Miller invited me to join the Ventura Tea Party website (as a Presidential Candidate). So I did.
And I did assuming that most of the Ventura Tea Party were all mostly REPUBLICANS. I could not speculate how I could make a difference in the Tea Party when they were all controlled by the party that invaded the Southern States without Constitutional authority… or the party that gave us an illegal British citizen as POTUS in 1881 (Chester Arthur). Or the party that ran another illegal alien, named John McCain in 2008… What could I possibly have in common with the Republican Tea Party?
Perhaps I am wrong!
I have been researching the various National Tea Parties today. I spent some time on the Arizona Tea Party Website (See: http://arizonateaparty.ning.com/forum/categories/national-tea-party-movement/listForCategory ). On this site they have a poll asking their members or readers to identify what party they align themselves with. I was surprised to discover it was contrary to what I have been thinking all along!
I don’t know how this would relate to other states and other counties, but there at the Arizona Tea Party, only half seem to identify themselves with the GOP.
See: http://arizonateaparty.ning.com/group/listofarizonateapartygroups
Conservative Independents are 32% of the Tea Party voters in this Arizona poll! Of course, I don’t know how reliable this poll is, but it is a good start in showing that the Independents are becoming a more powerful voting block and cannot be swept under the rug anymore!
But it is amusing to read however, that the Arizona Tea Party on their VOTER REGISTRATION PAGE states:
It is clearly apparent that the leaders of this Tea Party are died-in-the-wool Republicans and this Tea Party has a definite GOP slant.
I would like to commend the VENTURA TEA PARTY. It is the first Tea Party ever to mention my name on their website. My name can be found at: http://venturacountyteaparty.ning.com/forum/topics/presidential-election (see bottom of presidential list.)
I ran for US Senate in 2010 and not a single Tea Party would accept my name as a Candidate on their “candidate list.” So I must confess that progress is finally being made! George just made HISTORY!
And too, it is from Arizona that the first Sheriff in America has promised to look into the Soetoro crimes. Bravo to the Arizona Tea Party! Things are looking up!
Edward C. Noonan
President – 2012
American Independent Party
And I did assuming that most of the Ventura Tea Party were all mostly REPUBLICANS. I could not speculate how I could make a difference in the Tea Party when they were all controlled by the party that invaded the Southern States without Constitutional authority… or the party that gave us an illegal British citizen as POTUS in 1881 (Chester Arthur). Or the party that ran another illegal alien, named John McCain in 2008… What could I possibly have in common with the Republican Tea Party?
Perhaps I am wrong!
I have been researching the various National Tea Parties today. I spent some time on the Arizona Tea Party Website (See: http://arizonateaparty.ning.com/forum/categories/national-tea-party-movement/listForCategory ). On this site they have a poll asking their members or readers to identify what party they align themselves with. I was surprised to discover it was contrary to what I have been thinking all along!
I don’t know how this would relate to other states and other counties, but there at the Arizona Tea Party, only half seem to identify themselves with the GOP.
See: http://arizonateaparty.ning.com/group/listofarizonateapartygroupsConservative Independents are 32% of the Tea Party voters in this Arizona poll! Of course, I don’t know how reliable this poll is, but it is a good start in showing that the Independents are becoming a more powerful voting block and cannot be swept under the rug anymore!
But it is amusing to read however, that the Arizona Tea Party on their VOTER REGISTRATION PAGE states:
“TIMELY INFORMATION
To all of you who are registered as Independents but will want to cast your ballot in the 2012 Presidential primaries for a Republican, you MUST re-register as a Republican. The rules are different than when voting in Congressional only primaries! If you want a voice in the Presidential primary this time around, be sure to re-register as a Republican.”
To all of you who are registered as Independents but will want to cast your ballot in the 2012 Presidential primaries for a Republican, you MUST re-register as a Republican. The rules are different than when voting in Congressional only primaries! If you want a voice in the Presidential primary this time around, be sure to re-register as a Republican.”
It is clearly apparent that the leaders of this Tea Party are died-in-the-wool Republicans and this Tea Party has a definite GOP slant.
I would like to commend the VENTURA TEA PARTY. It is the first Tea Party ever to mention my name on their website. My name can be found at: http://venturacountyteaparty.ning.com/forum/topics/presidential-election (see bottom of presidential list.)
I ran for US Senate in 2010 and not a single Tea Party would accept my name as a Candidate on their “candidate list.” So I must confess that progress is finally being made! George just made HISTORY!
And too, it is from Arizona that the first Sheriff in America has promised to look into the Soetoro crimes. Bravo to the Arizona Tea Party! Things are looking up!
Edward C. Noonan
President – 2012
American Independent Party
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
TEA PARTY FOUNDER AND FOLLOWERS ARE BRAINWASHED
It has become clear to me that the founder of the TEA PARTY and 99.9% of all of the Tea Party patriots thereafter are either brainwashed, or totally ignorant of the real problem of America. First, let us discuss the beginnings of the Tea Party. We start on Feb 19, 2009. We had just been taken over by an illegal alien and a false NATURAL BORN CITIZEN as our Commander in Chief. He was/is a Muslim and a Marxist…but then again, what is the difference?
Here is a YouTube of the beginning minutes of the TEA PARTY:
CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k
Poor Mr. Santelli completely misses the point about the crisis in America. He places the blame on Middle Class America that dreams of having their own homes and own property.
Most states give their citizens a promise that it is an inalienable right to own property. My states promises:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
What Santell (Tea Party founder) is completely missing, is that it is NOT the fault of the American people who wants a home (even if it has an extra bathroom or not) but instead it is the fault of the system that is corrupt because of the evil organization that controls every aspect of American life! And this is the FED. The Fed owns the banks, the mortgage companies, the money, the interest rates and all aspects thereof.
I explained in my last post that the FED does not comply with the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913 which mandates it reports ALL TRANSACTIONS to Congress…but it does not and has NEVER done so EVER! There has been no oversight over this corrupt banking cabal since day one!
The Fed was spawned in 1913. Here is a Congressional Record speech by Congressman McFadden in 1934:
Congressman McFadden's Speech
On the Federal Reserve Corporation
Congressional Record 1934
“The Federal Reserve - - A Corrupt Institution”
http://www.afn.org/~govern/mcfadden.html
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.
"This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
"Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime…”
[end quote]
That was what was being said in 1934…let us fast forward to 2009, 2010 and 2011…
After the Kenyan/Indonesian illegal alien became the DE FACTO dictator of the United States, an on-air editor for the CNBC Business News network named Rick Santelli became one of the founding fathers of the TEA PARTY. Wikipedia says, "Santelli accused the government of "promoting bad behavior", and raised the possibility of a "Chicago Tea Party". He also suggested that individuals who knowingly purchased high-risk mortgages (and faced impending foreclosure as a consequence) were "losers".
I find this to be offensive to accuse Americans of being “LOSERS” because they desire a home to call their own! And I find it offensive we live in a society that makes Americans “LOSERS” when the only home they can get…is with “high risk mortgages.”
And Wikipedia reports, “On November 4, 2010, the Tea Party Patriots organization confirmed in an email to their members that Santelli's comments did in fact start the Tea Party movement.”
And Wikipedia continues, "Tea Party Patriots wishes to extend a special thank you to Rick Santelli for his rant on February 19, 2009, which started this entire movement. Without Rick's rant, this movement would never have started. Many others will try to take credit but don't be fooled. He was the spark that began this fire."
Yes, perhaps a slight word of thanks to Santelli could be given…but the fact still remains. The FED CONTROLS OUR WEALTH, OUR PROSPERITY AND OUR FUTURE. And long as Santelli and the dream slobbering Tea Partiers are apathetic about the FED, all endeavors they attempt are for naught!
Wikipedia also says, "In addition to this acclaim from the Tea Party movement, Santelli has also garnered some praise from libertarians:
In the world of financial "journalism," CNBC’s Rick Santelli stands out as a refreshing and intelligent antidote to the hoards of perma-bulls, fed apologists, and chart sorcerers that otherwise pollute the financial airwaves. Apart from his wonderfully energetic and quirky manner of speaking, and apart from his fantastic last name, Santelli is never afraid to challenge economists, Fed officials, and other mainstream talking heads. Talking points that are taken for granted or left unchallenged by Santelli’s mind-numbing colleagues are passionately attacked by the bond-tracking Italian dervish."
To this I say, as long as Ron Paul staples the REPUBLICAN tag on his forehead, he too is enslaved to forever worshipping and adoring the Federal Reserve thugs who control both of the two big buck political parties.
With this in mind, every TEA PARTY member should be required to watch two YouTube videos. One is with Rick Santelli. It is what I have entitled “The Fed is like a bad appendix ready to explode.”
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgHS0zItEJ4
The other is where Rick Santelli asks 'Who created the Federal Reserve?" and mentions Jekyll Island
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KV0ofR7c7o&feature=related
It is astonishing how fast the conversation was quickly diverted AWAY from any discussion of the matter of Jekyll Island and the secret origins of the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (aka International Bankster cabal)!
Did you know Daily Kos has accused the FED of ripping American taxpayers off for over $47 Trillion dollars…which each American is liable to cover?
Daily Kos reports, "In case you haven't seen the OCC Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives for 2009, I think you might be interested in seeing exactly what is being hidden off the balance sheets that most American are not aware of.....try $47 Trillion dollars of derivatives backed by the government or rotting in some toxic pool that nobody wants anyone to know about, or more important wants you to know about."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/07/18/754813/-$47-Trillion-Toxic-Derivatives-the-Banks-FED-Are-Hiding
(NOTE: From my research this is just in the United States...worldwide the International Bankster cabal holds $1.2 Quadillion in Toxic/worthless assets.)
My recommendation to the Tea Parties and their leadership… stop accepting the accusation that it is American citizen’s fault for not keeping a job, or not keeping their home (due to foreclosure). The fault lies with the criminal CENTRAL BANKS of every country that has stolen the wealth from their peoples. Ben “Lucifer” Bernanke and his evil cohorts (in the Republican and Democrat Parties) are pure evil and this should be the focus of the Tea Party. Else America is dead and can never be resurrected.
Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
Here is a YouTube of the beginning minutes of the TEA PARTY:
CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k
Poor Mr. Santelli completely misses the point about the crisis in America. He places the blame on Middle Class America that dreams of having their own homes and own property.
Most states give their citizens a promise that it is an inalienable right to own property. My states promises:
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
What Santell (Tea Party founder) is completely missing, is that it is NOT the fault of the American people who wants a home (even if it has an extra bathroom or not) but instead it is the fault of the system that is corrupt because of the evil organization that controls every aspect of American life! And this is the FED. The Fed owns the banks, the mortgage companies, the money, the interest rates and all aspects thereof.
I explained in my last post that the FED does not comply with the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913 which mandates it reports ALL TRANSACTIONS to Congress…but it does not and has NEVER done so EVER! There has been no oversight over this corrupt banking cabal since day one!
The Fed was spawned in 1913. Here is a Congressional Record speech by Congressman McFadden in 1934:
Congressman McFadden's Speech
On the Federal Reserve Corporation
Congressional Record 1934
“The Federal Reserve - - A Corrupt Institution”
http://www.afn.org/~govern/mcfadden.html
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.
"This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
"Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime…”
[end quote]
That was what was being said in 1934…let us fast forward to 2009, 2010 and 2011…
After the Kenyan/Indonesian illegal alien became the DE FACTO dictator of the United States, an on-air editor for the CNBC Business News network named Rick Santelli became one of the founding fathers of the TEA PARTY. Wikipedia says, "Santelli accused the government of "promoting bad behavior", and raised the possibility of a "Chicago Tea Party". He also suggested that individuals who knowingly purchased high-risk mortgages (and faced impending foreclosure as a consequence) were "losers".
I find this to be offensive to accuse Americans of being “LOSERS” because they desire a home to call their own! And I find it offensive we live in a society that makes Americans “LOSERS” when the only home they can get…is with “high risk mortgages.”
And Wikipedia reports, “On November 4, 2010, the Tea Party Patriots organization confirmed in an email to their members that Santelli's comments did in fact start the Tea Party movement.”
And Wikipedia continues, "Tea Party Patriots wishes to extend a special thank you to Rick Santelli for his rant on February 19, 2009, which started this entire movement. Without Rick's rant, this movement would never have started. Many others will try to take credit but don't be fooled. He was the spark that began this fire."
Yes, perhaps a slight word of thanks to Santelli could be given…but the fact still remains. The FED CONTROLS OUR WEALTH, OUR PROSPERITY AND OUR FUTURE. And long as Santelli and the dream slobbering Tea Partiers are apathetic about the FED, all endeavors they attempt are for naught!
Wikipedia also says, "In addition to this acclaim from the Tea Party movement, Santelli has also garnered some praise from libertarians:
In the world of financial "journalism," CNBC’s Rick Santelli stands out as a refreshing and intelligent antidote to the hoards of perma-bulls, fed apologists, and chart sorcerers that otherwise pollute the financial airwaves. Apart from his wonderfully energetic and quirky manner of speaking, and apart from his fantastic last name, Santelli is never afraid to challenge economists, Fed officials, and other mainstream talking heads. Talking points that are taken for granted or left unchallenged by Santelli’s mind-numbing colleagues are passionately attacked by the bond-tracking Italian dervish."
To this I say, as long as Ron Paul staples the REPUBLICAN tag on his forehead, he too is enslaved to forever worshipping and adoring the Federal Reserve thugs who control both of the two big buck political parties.
With this in mind, every TEA PARTY member should be required to watch two YouTube videos. One is with Rick Santelli. It is what I have entitled “The Fed is like a bad appendix ready to explode.”
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgHS0zItEJ4
The other is where Rick Santelli asks 'Who created the Federal Reserve?" and mentions Jekyll Island
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KV0ofR7c7o&feature=related
It is astonishing how fast the conversation was quickly diverted AWAY from any discussion of the matter of Jekyll Island and the secret origins of the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (aka International Bankster cabal)!
Did you know Daily Kos has accused the FED of ripping American taxpayers off for over $47 Trillion dollars…which each American is liable to cover?
Daily Kos reports, "In case you haven't seen the OCC Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives for 2009, I think you might be interested in seeing exactly what is being hidden off the balance sheets that most American are not aware of.....try $47 Trillion dollars of derivatives backed by the government or rotting in some toxic pool that nobody wants anyone to know about, or more important wants you to know about."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/07/18/754813/-$47-Trillion-Toxic-Derivatives-the-Banks-FED-Are-Hiding
(NOTE: From my research this is just in the United States...worldwide the International Bankster cabal holds $1.2 Quadillion in Toxic/worthless assets.)
My recommendation to the Tea Parties and their leadership… stop accepting the accusation that it is American citizen’s fault for not keeping a job, or not keeping their home (due to foreclosure). The fault lies with the criminal CENTRAL BANKS of every country that has stolen the wealth from their peoples. Ben “Lucifer” Bernanke and his evil cohorts (in the Republican and Democrat Parties) are pure evil and this should be the focus of the Tea Party. Else America is dead and can never be resurrected.
Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
Senator Bernie Sanders doesn't know squat (about the FED)
Senator Bernie Sanders this month thought he was opening a pandora’s box by accusing the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke with the crime of stealing $16 Trillion from the American people. On Sander’s webpage, he quotes the GAO supposedly new (1st ever) report concerning the theft of the American’s taxpayers cash and spending the money on foreign banks and U.S. and foreign “fat-cat” corporations. You can read Sanders accusations at: http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/index.cfm?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3
"As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," said Sanders.
Sanders provided his “backup proof” by providing a link to the GAO report document that he was quoting: http://sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/GAO%20Fed%20Investigation.pdf
I was all pumped up get this new information. I am opposed on the entire concept of the FED and want to find as much dirt as I can on this unconstitutional organization. The FED is not constitutional now, nor will they EVER be! And I firmly believe that the FED is indeed raping the American public by giving our taxpayer money out to foreign countries and banks.
But as usual… our Senators are complete morons. It is clear that Sanders never read the GAO report nor did anyone in his staff. There are no such accusations by the GAO report detailing a $16 Trillion expenditure (or totaling $16 Trillion) anywhere in the gibberish filled document that the GAO calls a “FED AUDIT.” $1 Trillion, $2 Trillion and up to $5 Trillion here and there are mentioned, but no PROOF of $16 Trillion being taken out of our coffers.
au·dit/ˈôdit/ Noun: An official inspection of an individual's or organization's accounts, typically by an independent body.
Verb: Conduct an official financial examination of (an individual's or organization's accounts).
If Sanders or anyone in the GAO, or anyone in the US Senate calls this “an audit” then it is clear why our nation is so screwed up! It was 252 pages of totally worthless goobledygook. There is not a lawyer, a brain surgeon, a philosopher in the world that could understand two adjoining sentences in this report! Here is an example:
“On September 19, 2008, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board) authorized the creation of the Asset- Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (AMLF) under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to provide liquidity support to money market mutual funds (MMMF) facing redemption pressures and to promote liquidity in the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) markets.1 AMLF became operational on September 22, 2008, and was operated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (FRBB). AMLF was initially set to expire on January 30, 2009. The Federal Reserve Board authorized three separate extensions of the program to address continuing strains in financial markets. AMLF expired on February 1, 2010.” [pg 155 actual page or pg 168 pdf]
This amusing gibberish is totally unintelligible. And not only that, Sec 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 gives no such “authorization.” This is a ploy that the FED uses throughout all of their “documentation” and of course, no one ever checks up and verifies their claims to see if the ACT actually authorizes them to do squat! But here is the actual worthless verbage of the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913:
Section 13. Powers of Federal Reserve Banks
3. Discounts for Individuals, Partnerships, and Corporations
A. In unusual and exigent circumstances, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, by the affirmative vote of not less than five members, may authorize any Federal reserve bank, during such periods as the said board may determine, at rates established in accordance with the provisions of section 14, subdivision (d), of this Act, to discount for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility, notes, drafts, and bills of exchange when such notes, drafts, and bills of exchange are indorsed or otherwise secured to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve bank: Provided, That before discounting any such note, draft, or bill of exchange, the Federal reserve bank shall obtain evidence that such participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility is unable to secure adequate credit accommodations from other banking institutions. All such discounts for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility shall be subject to such limitations, restrictions, and regulations as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe.
B.
i. As soon as is practicable after the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the Board shall establish, by regulation, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the policies and procedures governing emergency lending under this paragraph. Such policies and procedures shall be designed to ensure that any emergency lending program or facility is for the purpose of providing liquidity to the financial system, and not to aid a failing financial company, and that the security for emergency loans is sufficient to protect taxpayers from losses and that any such program is terminated in a timely and orderly fashion. The policies and procedures established by the Board shall require that a Federal reserve bank assign, consistent with sound risk management practices and to ensure protection for the taxpayer, a lendable value to all collateral for a loan executed by a Federal reserve bank under this paragraph in determining whether the loan is secured satisfactorily for purposes of this paragraph.
ii. The Board shall establish procedures to prohibit borrowing from programs and facilities by borrowers that are insolvent. Such procedures may include a certification from the chief executive officer (or other authorized officer) of the borrower, at the time the borrower initially borrows under the program or facility (with a duty by the borrower to update the certification if the information in the certification materially changes), that the borrower is not insolvent. A borrower shall be considered insolvent for purposes of this subparagraph, if the borrower is in bankruptcy, resolution under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or any other Federal or State insolvency proceeding.
iii. A program or facility that is structured to remove assets from the balance sheet of a single and specific company, or that is established for the purpose of assisting a single and specific company avoid bankruptcy, resolution under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or any other Federal or State insolvency proceeding, shall not be considered a program or facility with broad-based eligibility.
iv. The Board may not establish any program or facility under this paragraph without the prior approval of the Secretary of the Treasury.
C. The Board shall provide to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives—
i. not later than 7 days after the Board authorizes any loan or other financial assistance under this paragraph, a report that includes—
I. the justification for the exercise of authority to provide such assistance;
II. the identity of the recipients of such assistance;
III. the date and amount of the assistance, and form in which the assistance was provided; and
IV. the material terms of the assistance, including—
§ aa. duration;
§ bb. collateral pledged and the value thereof;
§ cc. all interest, fees, and other revenue or items of value to be received in exchange for the assistance;
§ dd. any requirements imposed on the recipient with respect to employee compensation, distribution of dividends, or any other corporate decision in exchange for the assistance; and
§ ee. the expected costs to the taxpayers of such assistance; and
ii. once every 30 days, with respect to any outstanding loan or other financial assistance under this paragraph, written updates on—
I. the value of collateral;
II. the amount of interest, fees, and other revenue or items of value received in exchange for the assistance; and
III. the expected or final cost to the taxpayers of such assistance.
D. The information required to be submitted to Congress under subparagraph (C) related to—
i. the identity of the participants in an emergency lending program or facility commenced under this paragraph;
ii. the amounts borrowed by each participant in any such program or facility;
iii. identifying details concerning the assets or collateral held by, under, or in connection with such a program or facility, shall be kept confidential, upon the written request of the Chairman of the Board, in which case such information shall be made available only to the Chairpersons or Ranking Members of the Committees described in subparagraph (C).
E. If an entity to which a Federal reserve bank has provided a loan under this paragraph becomes a covered financial company, as defined in section 201 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, at any time while such loan is outstanding, and the Federal reserve bank incurs a realized net loss on the loan, then the Federal reserve bank shall have a claim equal to the amount of the net realized loss against the covered entity, with the same priority as an obligation to the Secretary of the Treasury under section 210(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
[12 USC 343. As added by act of July 21, 1932 (47 Stat. 715); and amended by acts of Aug. 23, 1935 (49 Stat. 714); Dec. 19, 1991 (105 Stat. 2386); and July 21, 2010 (124 Stat. 2113). As enacted by Public Law 111-203 (124. Stat. 2115), “any reference in any provision of Federal law to the third undesignated paragraph of section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act [FRA] (12 USC 343) shall be deemed to be a reference to section 13(3) of the FRA.”]
There are no two people in America or on this planet that can give a solid, meaningful summary of this Section 13. No two lawyers can even define the words let alone the concepts of any two sentences therein. If any one of you think you have even a partially functioning brain, please just give me a summary and MEANING of just the 1st paragraph of above Section 13 (3)… or if you think I am being too harsh/mean, then pick any section, any page and paragraph of the other 31 Sections of this gibberish of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and please attempt to translate the unintelligible mumblings found therein.
Bernie, all I can say… is that you don’t know squat! Between you and the FED, I understand why our nation is so SCREWED!
Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
"As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," said Sanders.
Sanders provided his “backup proof” by providing a link to the GAO report document that he was quoting: http://sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/GAO%20Fed%20Investigation.pdf
I was all pumped up get this new information. I am opposed on the entire concept of the FED and want to find as much dirt as I can on this unconstitutional organization. The FED is not constitutional now, nor will they EVER be! And I firmly believe that the FED is indeed raping the American public by giving our taxpayer money out to foreign countries and banks.
But as usual… our Senators are complete morons. It is clear that Sanders never read the GAO report nor did anyone in his staff. There are no such accusations by the GAO report detailing a $16 Trillion expenditure (or totaling $16 Trillion) anywhere in the gibberish filled document that the GAO calls a “FED AUDIT.” $1 Trillion, $2 Trillion and up to $5 Trillion here and there are mentioned, but no PROOF of $16 Trillion being taken out of our coffers.
au·dit/ˈôdit/ Noun: An official inspection of an individual's or organization's accounts, typically by an independent body.
Verb: Conduct an official financial examination of (an individual's or organization's accounts).
If Sanders or anyone in the GAO, or anyone in the US Senate calls this “an audit” then it is clear why our nation is so screwed up! It was 252 pages of totally worthless goobledygook. There is not a lawyer, a brain surgeon, a philosopher in the world that could understand two adjoining sentences in this report! Here is an example:
“On September 19, 2008, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board) authorized the creation of the Asset- Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (AMLF) under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to provide liquidity support to money market mutual funds (MMMF) facing redemption pressures and to promote liquidity in the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) markets.1 AMLF became operational on September 22, 2008, and was operated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (FRBB). AMLF was initially set to expire on January 30, 2009. The Federal Reserve Board authorized three separate extensions of the program to address continuing strains in financial markets. AMLF expired on February 1, 2010.” [pg 155 actual page or pg 168 pdf]
This amusing gibberish is totally unintelligible. And not only that, Sec 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 gives no such “authorization.” This is a ploy that the FED uses throughout all of their “documentation” and of course, no one ever checks up and verifies their claims to see if the ACT actually authorizes them to do squat! But here is the actual worthless verbage of the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913:
Section 13. Powers of Federal Reserve Banks
3. Discounts for Individuals, Partnerships, and Corporations
A. In unusual and exigent circumstances, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, by the affirmative vote of not less than five members, may authorize any Federal reserve bank, during such periods as the said board may determine, at rates established in accordance with the provisions of section 14, subdivision (d), of this Act, to discount for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility, notes, drafts, and bills of exchange when such notes, drafts, and bills of exchange are indorsed or otherwise secured to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve bank: Provided, That before discounting any such note, draft, or bill of exchange, the Federal reserve bank shall obtain evidence that such participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility is unable to secure adequate credit accommodations from other banking institutions. All such discounts for any participant in any program or facility with broad-based eligibility shall be subject to such limitations, restrictions, and regulations as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe.
B.
i. As soon as is practicable after the date of enactment of this subparagraph, the Board shall establish, by regulation, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the policies and procedures governing emergency lending under this paragraph. Such policies and procedures shall be designed to ensure that any emergency lending program or facility is for the purpose of providing liquidity to the financial system, and not to aid a failing financial company, and that the security for emergency loans is sufficient to protect taxpayers from losses and that any such program is terminated in a timely and orderly fashion. The policies and procedures established by the Board shall require that a Federal reserve bank assign, consistent with sound risk management practices and to ensure protection for the taxpayer, a lendable value to all collateral for a loan executed by a Federal reserve bank under this paragraph in determining whether the loan is secured satisfactorily for purposes of this paragraph.
ii. The Board shall establish procedures to prohibit borrowing from programs and facilities by borrowers that are insolvent. Such procedures may include a certification from the chief executive officer (or other authorized officer) of the borrower, at the time the borrower initially borrows under the program or facility (with a duty by the borrower to update the certification if the information in the certification materially changes), that the borrower is not insolvent. A borrower shall be considered insolvent for purposes of this subparagraph, if the borrower is in bankruptcy, resolution under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or any other Federal or State insolvency proceeding.
iii. A program or facility that is structured to remove assets from the balance sheet of a single and specific company, or that is established for the purpose of assisting a single and specific company avoid bankruptcy, resolution under title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or any other Federal or State insolvency proceeding, shall not be considered a program or facility with broad-based eligibility.
iv. The Board may not establish any program or facility under this paragraph without the prior approval of the Secretary of the Treasury.
C. The Board shall provide to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives—
i. not later than 7 days after the Board authorizes any loan or other financial assistance under this paragraph, a report that includes—
I. the justification for the exercise of authority to provide such assistance;
II. the identity of the recipients of such assistance;
III. the date and amount of the assistance, and form in which the assistance was provided; and
IV. the material terms of the assistance, including—
§ aa. duration;
§ bb. collateral pledged and the value thereof;
§ cc. all interest, fees, and other revenue or items of value to be received in exchange for the assistance;
§ dd. any requirements imposed on the recipient with respect to employee compensation, distribution of dividends, or any other corporate decision in exchange for the assistance; and
§ ee. the expected costs to the taxpayers of such assistance; and
ii. once every 30 days, with respect to any outstanding loan or other financial assistance under this paragraph, written updates on—
I. the value of collateral;
II. the amount of interest, fees, and other revenue or items of value received in exchange for the assistance; and
III. the expected or final cost to the taxpayers of such assistance.
D. The information required to be submitted to Congress under subparagraph (C) related to—
i. the identity of the participants in an emergency lending program or facility commenced under this paragraph;
ii. the amounts borrowed by each participant in any such program or facility;
iii. identifying details concerning the assets or collateral held by, under, or in connection with such a program or facility, shall be kept confidential, upon the written request of the Chairman of the Board, in which case such information shall be made available only to the Chairpersons or Ranking Members of the Committees described in subparagraph (C).
E. If an entity to which a Federal reserve bank has provided a loan under this paragraph becomes a covered financial company, as defined in section 201 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, at any time while such loan is outstanding, and the Federal reserve bank incurs a realized net loss on the loan, then the Federal reserve bank shall have a claim equal to the amount of the net realized loss against the covered entity, with the same priority as an obligation to the Secretary of the Treasury under section 210(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
[12 USC 343. As added by act of July 21, 1932 (47 Stat. 715); and amended by acts of Aug. 23, 1935 (49 Stat. 714); Dec. 19, 1991 (105 Stat. 2386); and July 21, 2010 (124 Stat. 2113). As enacted by Public Law 111-203 (124. Stat. 2115), “any reference in any provision of Federal law to the third undesignated paragraph of section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act [FRA] (12 USC 343) shall be deemed to be a reference to section 13(3) of the FRA.”]
There are no two people in America or on this planet that can give a solid, meaningful summary of this Section 13. No two lawyers can even define the words let alone the concepts of any two sentences therein. If any one of you think you have even a partially functioning brain, please just give me a summary and MEANING of just the 1st paragraph of above Section 13 (3)… or if you think I am being too harsh/mean, then pick any section, any page and paragraph of the other 31 Sections of this gibberish of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and please attempt to translate the unintelligible mumblings found therein.
Bernie, all I can say… is that you don’t know squat! Between you and the FED, I understand why our nation is so SCREWED!
Edward C. Noonan
President - 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)